- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 18 December 2024
- Bench
- Manish Mathur
- Case no.
- A227 6095/2024
Follow Allahabad High CourtFollow Manish Mathur
Judgment
Court No. - 19 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6095 of 2024 Petitioner :- Upma Verma Respondent :- Tahsildar (Judicial ) Haidergarh Barabanki And 9 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mukesh Kumar Pandey,Sharda Mohan Tiwari,Vibhuti Narain Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.
¶1Heard Ms. Saniya, learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of opposite party no.1.
¶2In view of order being passed, notices to opposite parties no.2 to 11 stand dispensed with.
¶3Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed seeking a direction to the authority concerned for expeditious disposal of Mutation
Case,
bearing
Case
No.T-202304120507816 (Upma Verma versus Ramnath & Ors.) under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code 2006 which is pending before Tehsildar (Judicial), Tehsil Haidergarh, District Barabanki.
¶4However a perusal of order-sheet indicates that disposal of aforesaid case is not being done due to continuous boycott calls of Bar Association concerned.
¶5In view of aforesaid, no specific time frame can be directed for early disposal of aforesaid case when the petitioner herself is at fault.
¶6Expeditiously subject to cooperation by parties in early disposal of the proceedings.
¶7However liberty is granted to petitioner to appear in person and argue her own case in case so desired.
¶8In view of aforesaid direction, petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 18.12.2024 Subodh/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.