- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 18 December 2024
- Bench
- Saurabh Lavania
- Case no.
- A483 896/2024
Follow Allahabad High CourtFollow Saurabh Lavania
Judgment
Court No. - 12 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 896 of 2024 Applicant :- Ramdas Opposite Party :- Sub Divisional Magistrate Tahsil Sohawal Dist. Ayodhya And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Vijayendra Prakash Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned Government Advocate for the State of U.P. and perused the record. The instant application under Section 483 Cr.P.C. has been preferred for the following main relief:- "Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to direct the Opposite party no.1 to decide the Case Number-03357/2018, Computerized Case No. T201804230203357, under section-133 Cr.P.C. Act, P.S.-Raunahi, District-Faizabad/Ayodhya titled "State Versus Sahdev Prasad" pending before him, expeditiously as early as possible, in the interest of justice as annexed as Annexure no.1 to this petition." Considering the facts and circumstances of the case indicated in the application including the period of pendency of the case in issue, the present application is disposed of with a direction to the court concerned to make all endeavour for concluding the proceedings of the case in issue, expeditiously as according to various pronouncements of the Hon'ble Apex Court including the judgment(s) passed in the case of Maneka Gandhi Versus Union of India and Another
(1978) 1 SCC 248, Hussainara Khatoon Versus Home Secretary, State of Bihar (1980) 1 SCC 81, Kadra Pahadiya and Others Versus State of Bihar
(1981) 3 SCC 671, the right to speedy trial/disposal of case is implicit under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. With the aforesaid, the instant application is disposed of. Order Date :- 18.12.2024 Jyoti/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.