VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2024 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Sandeep Yadav @ Sandeep Kumar Yadav v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
18 December 2024
Bench
Vivek Chaudhary, Om Prakash Shukla
Case no.
CRLP 9646/2024

Follow Allahabad High CourtFollow Vivek ChaudharyFollow Om Prakash Shukla

Judgment

Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9646 of 2024 Petitioner :- Sandeep Yadav @ Sandeep Kumar Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ripu Daman Shahi,Sikandar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State/opposite parties and perused the record.

¶2This petition seeks issuance of direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned F.I.R. dated 06.12.2024, bearing F.I.R./Case Crime No.0567/2024, under Sections 115(2), 329(2), 333, 351(2), 352 B.N.S. and Section 3(1)(d) & 3(1)(gha) of S.C./S.T. Act, Police Station Krishna Nagar, District Lucknow South (Commissionerate Lucknow).

¶3Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the offences as alleged in F.I.R. have maximum punishment for the term less than seven years imprisonment, whereas, the police is trying to arrest him, which is against the mandates of Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶4Learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondent State has given a statement on behalf of investigating agency that because the offence allegedly committed by the petitioner, entails sentence of less than seven years, provisions of Section 35(3) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) shall be strictly followed in terms of judgment rendered by Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in a case reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273: Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar and another.

¶5Considering the stand of the investigating agency, learned counsel for the petitioner states that let this petition be disposed of in view of the above said facts.

¶6Accordingly, this petition is disposed of in view of the provisions of Section 35(3) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) and the law as laid down by Apex Court in the case of Arnesh Kumar (supra). (Om Prakash Shukla,J.) (Vivek Chaudhary,J.) Order Date :- 18.12.2024 Saurabh High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.