- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 18 December 2024
- Bench
- Manish Mathur
- Case no.
- A227 6205/2024
Follow Allahabad High CourtFollow Manish Mathur
Judgment
Court No. - 19 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6205 of 2024 Petitioner :- Smt. Poonam Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kamlesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J. Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned State Counsel for opposite party no. 1 and 2. In view of order being passed, notice to opposite parties no. 3 & 4 stands dispensed with. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to concerned authority for expeditious disposal of proceedings for mutation instituted by petitioner which are pending consideration since 2021. Upon consideration of submissions advanced and perusal of material on record particularly the order-sheet it appears that parties have already put in appearance and the case was in fact listed for evidence. Learned counsel appears for proceedings are pending on account of not only boycott calls of the Bar Association but also on account of Presiding Officer being busy in an administrative work. Considering the fact that mutation proceedings are summary in nature, opposite party no. 2 i.e. Tehsildar, Tehsil-SAdar, District Ayodhay is directed to decide the Case No. 03003 of 2021, Computerized Case No. T202104230103003 (Poonam Versus Budhulal) expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months from the date a certified copy of this order is brought on record of proceedings, without granting any undue adjournments to either parties and in case there is no other legal impediment. The aforesaid time frame shall be subject to cooperation by petitioner in early disposal of the proceedings. In view of aforesaid, petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 18.12.2024 Satish High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.