- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 18 December 2024
- Bench
- Manish Mathur
- Case no.
- A227 6181/2024
Follow Allahabad High CourtFollow Manish Mathur
Judgment
Court No. - 19 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6181 of 2024 Petitioner :- Umrai And 2 Others Respondent :- Commissioner Lucknow Disision, Lucknow And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajeet Kumar Singh,Pradeep Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dilip Kumar Pandey Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J. Heard learned counsel for petitioners, learned State Counsel for opposite parties 1 and 2 and Mr. Dilip Kumar Pandey learned counsel for opposite party No.3 . In view of order being passed, notices to opposite parties 4 and 5 stand dispensed with. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the authority concerned for expeditious disposal of application for interim relief pending in appeal No. 3490 of 2024 instituted by petitioner. It has been submitted that opposite parties 4 and 5 had filed a partition suit which was decreed and against which the aforesaid appeal has been preferred by petitioners alongwith an application for interim relief which is yet pending consideration. It is submitted that there is grave urgency in the matter so as not to change the nature of property in question. In view of aforesaid facts and circumstances, the opposite party No.1 i.e. Commissioner, Lucknow Division, Lucknow is directed to consider and decide application for interim relief preferred in appeal No. 3490 of 2024 expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date service report regarding service upon the respondents is brought on record. In the meantime the opposite party No.1 may also consider grant of interim injunction in case the appellants are able to make out a case for same. With the aforesaid directions, the petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 18.12.2024 prabhat High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.