- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 18 December 2024
- Bench
- Karunesh Singh Pawar
- Case no.
- ABAIL 2718/2024
Follow Allahabad High CourtFollow Karunesh Singh Pawar
Judgment
Court No. - 16 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 2718 of 2024 Applicant :- Pramod Kumar Yadav Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Karm Veer Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. The present bail application under Section 438 Cr.PC. has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in case crime/FIR No. 469/2020, under Sections 419/420/467/468/471/120B I.P.C., P.S. Kotwali Nagar, District Ayodhya. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA for the State. This is the second bail application. The first bail application of the applicant was rejected vide order dated 08.03.2021 passed in CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 2662/20241. Perused the record. This Court vide order dated 11.12.2024 granted time to learned AGA to seek instructions in the matter. Instructions received by the learned AGA has been produced before the Court wherein it has been mentioned by the investigating officer of Crime Branch District Ayodhya that the applicant is not cooperating in the investigation. The applicant has not appeared before him for recording his statement. It has been further mentioned that the police has been directed to arrest the applicant. Considering the instructions provided by the learned AGA as well as considering the fact that the applicant is not cooperating in the investigation; the delay in approaching the Court; the applicant has a criminal history of one case, it would not be appropriate to enlarge the applicant on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application of the applicant is dismissed. Order Date :- 18.12.2024/R.C. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.