Suresh Pasi v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko

Court No. -12 Case :-APPLICATION U/S 482 No. -11694 of 2024 Applicant :-Suresh Pasi Opposite Party :-State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :-Ashish Kumar Maurya Counsel for Opposite Party :-G.A. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record. The instant application has been filed by the applicant to permit him to submit two sureties and one personal bond for all six cases from the applicant and applicant has been granted bail in all cases by the court below. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in all six cases. He next submitted that in all the cases registered against the applicant, he has been granted bail by the court below. He says that the applicant is very poor person and not in a position to furnish huge sureties in each and every case in compliance of bail orders. It is further submitted that the details of cases registered against applicant in District Pratapgarh are as follows:-

¶1Case crime no 550/2021 under Section 395 IPC, Police Station Lalganj,

¶2Case crime no 443/2021, under Sections 395,412 IPC,Police Station Raniganj

¶3Case crime no 574/2021 under Section 307 IPC , Police Station Lalganj

¶4Case crime no. 577/2021 under Section 3/25 Arms Act, Police Station Lalganj

¶5Case crime no. 188/2021 under Section 420,467,468,471,411 IPC, Police Station Maheshganj

¶6Case crime no. 186/2021, under Sections 393,506 IPC, Police Station Maheshganj Learned counsel for the applicant has relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court passed in Special Leave to Appeal (Criminal) No. 8914-8915 of 2018; Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky Vs. State of U.P. Learned A.G.A. submits that he does not want to file any counter affidavit. In view of the facts and circumstances as well as rival submissions advanced by the learned counsel for both the parties, the present application stands disposed of finally in the light law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky (Supra) and the Court below is directed to execute the personal bond of Rs. 20,000/- in every case and produce two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court/Magistrate concerned in one case which shall hold good for rest of the cases. Order Date :- 19.12.2024 Jyoti/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench