VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2024 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Mohd. Javed @ Javed Husain Khan and 3 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko and 2 Others

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
19 December 2024
Bench
Saurabh Lavaniaauthor
Case no.
A482 11709/2024

Follow Allahabad High CourtFollow Saurabh Lavania

Judgment

Court No. - 12 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 11709 of 2024 Applicant :- Mohd. Javed @ Javed Husain Khan And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Ved Prakash Yadav,Girjesh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned AGA for the State as well as perused the record. The present application has been filed for the following main relief:- "i. To quash the summoning order dated 18.06.2018 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sultanpur, whereby, the petitioners have been summoned in the Criminal Case No: 5626/2023, arising out of Case Crime No: 001/2018, under section 147, 323, 504, 506, 427, 452 IPC, Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Sultanpur, which is annexed as Annexure No: 1 to this petition. ii. To quash the charge sheet dated 21.03.2018 filed in the Case Crime No: 001/2018, under section 147, 323, 504, 506, 427, 452 IPC by the Police of the Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Sultanpur, which is annexed as Annexure No: 3 to this petition. iii. To quash the entire proceeding of the Criminal Case No: 5626/2023, arising out of Case Crime No: 001/2018, under section 147, 323, 504, 506, 427, 452 IPC, Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Sultanpur." After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that liberty may be given to the applicants to file bail application before the trial court which may be decided in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2022) 10 S.C.R. 351: (2022) 10 SCC 51 as also to prefer a discharge application before the court below and the same may be decided expeditiously. Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants. Keeping in view the aforesaid, the present application is disposed of with liberty as prayed for and with a direction to the court below that if the applicants apply for bail before the Court concerned, his prayer for bail shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law. Liberty is also granted to the applicants to move discharge application before the court below and the same shall be decided expeditiously in accordance with law. Taking note of the facts of the case and also the observation made in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil (Supra), this Court is of the view that it would be appropriate to observe that it is expected from the Police Officer concerned that for a period of 30 days from today or till the applicants apply for bail, whichever is earlier, he would not take any coercive action against the applicants in the aforesaid case. With the aforesaid observations, the present application is disposed of. Order Date :- 19.12.2024 Jyoti/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.