- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 18 December 2024
- Bench
- Rajeev Singh
- Case no.
- A482 9242/2024
Follow Allahabad High CourtFollow Rajeev Singh
Judgment
Court No. - 13 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9242 of 2024 Applicant :- Adarsh Singh @ Yuvraj Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Mayankar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
¶1Counter affidavits filed by learned A.G.A. duly signed by Mr. Ashwani Kumar Pandey, Sub Inspector/Investigating Officer, Police Station-Police Line, District-Bahraich and Mr. Vinit Jaiswal, Superintendent of Police, Gonda are taken on record.
¶2Heard.
¶3The instant application has been filed for quashing the impugned charge-sheet dated 21.09.2020, under Sections 323 & 504 of I.P.C., Police Station-Umribegumganj, District-Gonda and impugned summoning order dated 10.02.2021 issued by learned Judicial Magistrate-II, District-Gonda as well as to quash the entire proceedings of Case No.518/2021 "State of U.P. Vs. Adarsh Singh @Yuvraj Singh & Others" arising out of Non-Cognizable Offence (N.C.R) No.132/2020, under Sections 323 & 504 of I.P.C., Police Station-Umribegumganaj, District-Gonda.
¶4Learned counsel for the applicant submits that on the basis of incorrect facts, the F.I.R. in question was lodged. After detailed investigation, the Investigating Officer came to the conclusion that the applicant was involved in the said incident. At the time of the said incident, the applicant was minor. He further submits that charge-sheet was submitted for the offense under Sections 323, 504 I.P.C. Thereafter, further investigation was conducted by the Investigating Officer who then came to the conclusion that no offense is made out against the applicant. He also submits that first police report submitted by the Investigating Officer forwarded to the Court concerned without considering the final police report, supplementary case diary dated
19.10.2020 as well as age of the applicant, hence, indulgence of this Court is required.
¶5Sri Rao Narendra Singh, learned A.G.A. submits that this fact is admitted that the charge-sheet was wrongly submitted despite the evident fact that no evidence was found against the applicant who was minor.
¶6Considering the submission of learned counsel for the parties and going through the contents of the application, aforesaid affidavits filed today as well as other relevant documents, it is evident that the fault has been admitted by the officials that after investigation, no material was found against the applicant who was minor. But, inadvertently first report was sent to the Court concerned. It is also evident that after final investigation, no evidence was found against the applicant, even then, police report was submitted to the Court concerned without considering the age of the applicant. Therefore, this Court is of the view that entire report submitted by the police and the proceedings arise on the basis of that report are illegal.
¶7In view of above, this application is allowed. The impugned charge-sheet dated 21.09.2020, under Sections 323 & 504 of I.P.C., Police Station-Umribegumganj, District-Gonda as well as impugned summoning order dated 10.02.2021 issued by learned Judicial Magistrate-II, District-Gonda and the entire proceedings of Case No.518/2021 "State of U.P. Vs. Adarsh Singh @Yuvraj Singh & Others" arising out of Non-Cognizable Offence (N.C.R) No.132/2020, under Sections 323 & 504 of I.P.C., Police Station-Umribegumganaj, District-Gonda are hereby quashed. Order Date :- 18.12.2024 Arpan High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.