Rajesh Kuamr Yadav v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko

Court No. -15 Case :-CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. -13131 of 2024 Applicant :-Rajesh Kuamr Yadav Opposite Party :-State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :-Prashant Vikram Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :-G.A. Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant with the prayer to release him on bail during the trial in Case Crime No. 218 of 2024, under sections 3/5A/5Kha/8 of U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act,1955, Police Station-Tarun, District-Ayodhya. Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely planted by the police. He added that the name of the applicant came into light only on the confessional statement of the co-accused person and nothing has been recovered from his possession. He next added that there is no criminal history of the applicant as is explained in paragragh no. 20 of the bail application and there is no cogent piece of evidence against the applicant so as to connect him in the instant matter and the police has planted him only on the basis of suspicion. He submits that the applicant is languishing in jail since 11-07-2024 and he undertakes that in case, he is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of the same and would cooperate in the trial proceedings. Further submitted that the identically situated co-accused namely Navi Sarvar, has already been enlarged on bail by this court vide order dated 19-11-2024 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 12019 of 2024 and the applicant is seeking parity of the same. Per contra, learned AGA appearing for the State has opposed the contentions aforesaid and submits that there are serious allegations against the applicant and as such, he is not entitled for any relief, but, he could not dispute the fact that the identically situated co-accused named above, has already been enlarged on bail. Having heard learned counsels for the parties and after perusal of material placed on record, it transpires that the applicant is languishing in jail since 11-07-2024; there is no criminal history of the applicant as is explained in paragragh no. 20 of the bail application coupled with the fact that the applicant has undertaken that if he is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of the same and would cooperate in the trial proceedings. Considering the submissions of learned counsel of both sides, nature of accusation and severity of punishment in case of conviction, nature of supporting evidence, prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge, reformative theory of punishment and considering larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and, without expressing any view on the merits of the case, I find it to be a fit case of bail. Let the applicant-Rajesh Kuamr Yadav, involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:-

(1) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, or otherwise during the investigation or trial;

(2) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. He shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufÏcient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code;

(3) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C.; and

(4) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code. The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by the court concerned and in case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail and send the applicant to prison. It is clarified that the observations made in this order are strictly confined to the disposal of this bail application and must not be construed to have any reflection on the merits of the case. Order Date :- 19.12.2024 AKS High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench