VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2024 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Shoaib v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
19 December 2024
Bench
Saurabh Lavaniaauthor
Case no.
NA528 128/2024

Judgment

Court No. - 12 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 128 of 2024 Applicant :- Shoaib Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Amit Kumar Singh,Sameer Kumar Upadhyay Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record. The instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. read with Section 528 Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (in short "BNSS") has been filed by the applicant to permit him to submit two sureties and personal bond in all the cases in which he was roped in. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in four cases. He has next submitted that in all the cases registered against the applicant, he has been granted bail by the court concerned. He says that the applicant is a very poor person and not in a position to furnish huge sureties in each and every case in compliance of bail orders. It is further submitted that the details of cases registered against applicant at District - Barabanki are as under :

(i) Case crime No. 424/2024 u/s 380/411 I.P.C., P. S. Fatehpur, District Barabanki.

ii) Case crime No. 679/2024 u/s 303(2)/317(2) BNS, P. S. Fatehpur, District Barabanki.

(iii) Case crime No.893/2024 u/s 303(2)/317 (2) B.N.S., P. S. Fatehpur, District - Barabanki.

(iv) Case crime No. 937/2024 u/s 324(4)/317(2)/331(6) B.N.S., P. S. Fatehpur, District - Barabanki. Learned counsel for the applicant has relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court passed in Special Leave to Appeal (Criminal) No. 8914-8915 of 2018; Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky Vs. State of U.P. Learned A.G.A. submits that he does not want to file any counter affidavit. Considering the observations made by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky (Supra) and also the observations made by this Court in the case of Shivam Gupta @ Shubham @ Lavi vs. State of U.P. through Secretary Home Civil Sectt. Lko (Application U/S 482 No.466 of 2024) as well as in Dr. Abhishek Yadav vs. State of U.P. (Application U/S 482 No.18948 of 2023), the present application is allowed with a direction that in case the applicant provides two sureties and bail bond in Case Crime No. 424/2024 u/s 380/411 I.P.C., P. S. Fatehpur, District Barabanki, then the same shall be held good in rest of the cases registered against the applicant at Districts Barabanki and the applicant shall be released on bail on that sureties. Order Date :- 19.12.2024 ML/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.