Awadhesh Ram v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. U.P. and 2 Others

Court No. - 13 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 11444 of 2024 Applicant :- Awadhesh Ram Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Vishal Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.

¶1Vakalatnama filed by Shri Vinay Kumar Dubey, Advocate on behalf of the opposite party Nos.2 & 3 is taken on record.

¶2Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State of U.P., learned counsel for the opposite party nos.2 & 3 and perused the record.

¶3This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the entire proceedings of Crl. Case No. 645 of 2023 as well

as

charge-sheet

dated

16.06.2023

and cognizance/summoning order dated 07.11.2023 passed in Crl. Case No. 645 of 2023 by learned Civil Judge (J.D.)/Judicial Magistrate, Tanda, Ambedkar Nagar.

¶4Learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned counsel for opposite party Nos.2 & 3 jointly submitted that vide order dated 20.11.2024, a direction was given to the court concerned to verify the factum of compromise executed by the parties. In pursuance of the aforesaid order, learned court concerned had verified the contents of compromise.

¶5Learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for opposite party nos.2 & 3 jointly submitted that the parties have entered into compromise, which has duly been verified by the court concerned vide report/order dated 29.11.2024.

¶6Learned A.G.A. has fairly conceded that compromise has been effected between the parties and the same has duly been verified by the court concerned.

¶7Hon'ble Apex Court in catena of decisions has held that inherent power can be used to do real and substantial justice as has been held in Gian Singh Vs State of Punjab, 2012 AIR SCW 5333, B.S. Joshi and others Vs State of Haryana, (2003) 3 SCC 675 and Narinder Singh Vs State of Punjab, (2014) 6 SCC 466. Hence, inherent power can be exercised to speed up the process of ending the criminal proceedings where the settlement is arrived at between the parties.

¶8In view of the aforesaid and the fact that parties do not want to pursue the case any further, the matter is purely of personal nature, which has been mutually settled between the parties by way of the compromise, therefore, no useful purpose would be served in proceeding with the matter further.

¶9For the discussions made above, the present application is allowed. The entire proceedings of Crl. Case No. 645 of 2023 as well as charge-sheet dated 16.06.2023 and cognizance/summoning order dated 07.11.2023 passed in Crl. Case No. 645 of 2023 by learned Civil Judge (J.D.)/Judicial Magistrate, Tanda, Ambedkar Nagar are hereby quashed.

¶10Office is directed to communicate this order to learned trial Court, forthwith. Order Date :- 18.12.2024 Arpan High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench