- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 20 December 2024
- Bench
- Rajan Roy, Brij Raj Singh
- Case no.
- 11069/2024
Judgment
Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11069 of 2024 Petitioner :- Smt. Janak Dulari And 4 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohammad Ehtesham Khan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.
¶1Heard counsel for the parties.
¶2Let the Sub-Divisional Magistrate concerned i.e. Opposite party no. 2 look into the matter as to why the execution case of the petitioner for execution of judgment and decree dated 10.07.2021 passed under Section 176 of U.P.Z.A & L.R. Act, 1950 in a partition suit bearing No.2604 of 2014 has not been registered in terms of Paragraph 460 of U.P. Revenue Court Manual and what is the impediment in this regard. If there is no impediment, then it be registered and proceeded as per law. However, if there is any legal impediment, then the same should be informed in writing to the petitioner. Let this exercise be done within two weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
¶3The writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 20.12.2024 Pks [Brij Raj Singh,J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.