Maheshwar Dayal v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Home

Court No. - 11 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 13242 of 2024 Applicant :- Maheshwar Dayal Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Counsel for Applicant :- Dwijendra Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶2It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is in jail since 21.07.2024 in Case Crime no. 0294/2024, under Sections 85/80(2) BNS and Section 3/4 D.P.Act, Police Station Mahmudabad, District Sitapur. It has been submitted that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case as he has not committed any offence as alleged.

¶3Attention has been drawn towards the impugned F.I.R. wherein the general allegations have been levelled against all family members including the present applicant. The present applicant is father-in-law of the victim (since deceased). No specific role has been attributed to him. The relation of the present applicant with his daughter-in-law (since deceased) was cordial and he has never demanded any dowry from her or her family members. The F.I.R. has been lodged having ulterior motive and extraneous design in the mind of the complainant. The cause of death is hanging. There is no antemortem injury except one ligature mark around the neck area which might be cause due to hanging. Charge-sheet has been filed in this case.

¶4Learned counsel for the applicant has stated that co-accused/mother-in-law has already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 19.12.2024 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 13139 of 2024.

¶5The learned counsel for the applicant has given an undertaking on behalf of applicant that the applicant shall not misuse the liberty of bail and shall cooperate with the trial proceedings and shall abide by all terms and conditions of bail, if granted.

¶6Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts as argued by the learned counsel for the applicant.

¶7Without entering into the merits of the case and considering the arguments of learned counsel for the parties, contents and allegations of the F.I.R., the fact that no specific role has been assigned to the present applicant, only general allegations have been levelled against the applicant, he has never demanded any dowry from the victim (since deceased) or her family members, the cause of death is hanging, there is no antemortem injury except one ligature mark around the neck area which might be caused due to hanging charge-sheet has been filed and co-accused/mother-in-law has already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 19.12.2024 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 13139 of 2024 and the undertaking given on behalf of the applicant that he shall not misuse the liberty of bail and shall cooperate in the trial proceedings, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in this case.

¶8Bail application is allowed.

¶9Let the applicant Maheshwar Dayal, involved in aforesaid case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice:-

(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.

(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.

(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

(v) The applicant shall not leave the country without permission of

the

Court

concerned. (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J) Order Date :- 20.12.2024 Arvind High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench