Dipendra Kumar Mishra v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy. Transport and 8 Others

Court No. - 7 Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 18924 of 2016 Petitioner :- Dipendra Kumar Mishra Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy. Transport And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manoj Kumar Mishra,Akhilesh Kumar,Dinesh Narayan Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,Acting Chief Justice Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.

¶1The prayer made in the instant petition is for a direction to opposite parties not to permit opposite party no. 5 to carry on fitment of retro reflective tape on the vehicles, as it is alleged that opposite party no. 5 was not the authorized agency.

¶2State counsel states that according to his instructions, the said work was not being done by opposite party no.5 but by an authorized agency.

¶3None is present on behalf of the petitioner even in revised call to controvert the submission made by learned State Counsel.

¶4We are, therefore, not inclined to proceed any further in the instant matter. The petition is consigned to record. (Saurabh Lavania, J) (Manoj Kumar Gupta, ACJ) Order Date :- 31.1.2024 RK High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench