- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 17 November 2024
- Bench
- S. Justice Mitali Thakuria
- Case no.
- AB 2687/2024
Judgment
ORDER
18.11.2024
Heard Mr. A. Khanikar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. R. J. Baruah, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State respondent. This application filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, praying for granting pre-arrest bail to the accused/petitioner in connection with Gerukamukh P.S. Case No. 10/2024 under Section 20(b) (ii) C of NDPS Act, 1985.
The Case Diary has been received and I have perused the same.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Khanikar, that the petitioner is innocent and he is no way involved in the alleged offence. The petitioner is neither the registered owner of the vehicle nor was he driving the vehicle. However, it is a fact that the father of the petitioner is the registered owner of the vehicle, and in this regard, the police are searching for him, which has led the petitioner to apprehend arrest. He further submits that the petitioner is willing to co-operate with the investigation, provided he is granted the privilege of pre-arrest bail. In this context, Mr. Baruah, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, submits that there is sufficient incriminating material against the accused/petitioner, as he was the person driving the vehicle at the time of the incident and fled upon seeing the police. He further raised objections to granting the privilege of pre-Page No.# 3/3 arrest bail to the accused/petitioner at this stage. After hearing the submission made by the learned Advocates of both sides as well as perusing the Case Diary, I find that custodial interrogation of the accused/applicant may be necessary to unearth some more facts of the case and accordingly, I am of the view that this is not a fit case, where, the privilege of pre-arrest bail can be granted to the accused/applicant at this stage and accordingly, the same stands rejected. In view of above, this Anticipatory Bail application stands disposed of. Case Diary be returned.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010211512024 ooooooo 2024:GAU-AS:11195 ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oAB/2687/2024o BINOYoSAIKIAo S/OoDIPTIoSAIKIAo VILL-oBALIOANIo P.O.oANDoP.S.oGHILAMARAo DIST.oLAKHIMPUR,oASSAM VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMo REPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoPP,oASSAM AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMRoAoKHANIKAR,oRoLoCHUTIA,MR.oPoKONWARo AdvocateoforotheoRespondento:oPP,oASSAM,oo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.