- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 17 November 2024
- Bench
- Kaushik Goswami
- Case no.
- I.A.(Civil) 3382/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 18.11.2024 Heard Mr. B. Khakhlary, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. I. Borthakur, learned Standing Counsel for Excise Department. By way of this application, the petitioner is seeking impleadment of one Upen Engti, Assistant Inspector of Excise M/s Dynasty Bonded Warehouse Private Limited, Nagaon, Morigaon, Assam as an arrayed party respondent. It appears that while filing the WP(C) No.5318/2024, the constable Upen Engti inadvertently was left out from being arrayed as a party respondent no. 5. It further appears that when the matter was moved on
23.10.2024, this Court allowed the learned counsel for the petitioner to implead the said constable, i.e. Upen Engti as a party respondent in the accompanying writ petition. In view of the aforesaid, it appears that the presence of the proposed respondent no. 5 is necessary for effective adjudication of the writ petition. Accordingly, the said constable, i.e. Upen Engti is impleaded as Page No.# 3/3 party respondent no. 5. The impleadment application stands allowed. Let a amended cause title be submitted to the Registry for doing the needful. With above observations and directions, this Interlocutory Application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010227772024 ooooooo 2024:GAU-AS:11227 ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oI.A.(Civil)/3382/2024o DIPAoTERONo D/O-oSRIoDHARMESWARoTERON,oR/O-oVILL.-oUPPERoHENGRABARI,oNEARo NABAJYOTIoCLUB,oP.O.oHENGRABARI,oP.S.oDISPUR,oDIST.oKAMRUP(M),o ASSAM,oPIN-o781036. VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoANDo4oORSo REPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoPRINCIPALoSECRETARYoEXCISE,oDEPARTMENToTOo THEoGOVERNMENToOFoASSAM,oDISPUR,oGUWAHATI-06. 2:OFFICEoOFoTHEoCOMMISSIONERoOFoEXCISE oASSAM oGUWAHATI-06. 3:ADDITIONALoCOMMISSIONERoOFoEXCISE oASSAMoHOUSEFEDoCOMPLEX oGHY-06. 4:SUPERINTENDENToOFoEXCISE oKAMRUP(M) oGUWAHATI. 5:UPENoENGTI oASSISTANToINSPECTORoOFoEXCISE oM/SoDYNASTYoBONDEDoWAREHOUSEoPVT.oLTD oNAGAON oDISTRICToMORIGAON oASSAo AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oBoKHAKHLARY,oMRoRoRAJKHOWA,UoSWARGIARYo Page No.# 2/3 Advocate for the Respondent : SC, EXCISE DEPTT., BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.