VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Mohit Sethiya and Anr v. Chiranjeeb Sarama Roy

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
19 November 2024
Bench
S. Justice Malasri Nandiauthor
Case no.
CRP(IO) 478/2024

Judgment

ORDER Date : 20.11.2024

Heard Mr. A. Kabra, learned counsel for the petitioners. The present application has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 09.09.2024 passed by the learned Civil Judge(Senior Division) cum Assistant Sessions Judge No. 3, Kamrup(M), Guwahati in Misc.(J) Case No. 114/2023 in T.S. No. 54/2023, whereby the Misc.(J) Case No. 114/2023 was kept in abeyance till the disposal of Misc.(J) Case No. 140/2023 in T.S. No. 54/2023. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the impugned order dated 09.09.2024 passed by the learned trial court, without giving the petitioners an opportunity of being heard. It is also submitted that the impugned order passed by the learned trial court is not sustainable in law as one Misc. case relates to relief of permanent injunction and in other Misc. case, the cause of action to claim a relief of specific performance and both are independent and one cannot include the other and vice versa. Hence, he has prayed that the impugned order dated 09.09.2024 is liable to be set aside by giving an opportunity to the petitioners of being heard before passing any order. In support of his submission, the learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on a case law-Sucha Singh Sodhi (D) Thr. LRs vs. Baldev Raj Walia & Anr. reported in SCC Civil Appeal No. 3777 of 2018. I have considered the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner. Page No.# 3/3 Considering the submission as well as the documents made available in the record, the impugned order dated 09.09.2024 is hereby set aside. However, the learned trial court is directed to pass any order after hearing both the parties in accordance with law. In view of the above, the criminal revision petition stands disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010237962024 ooooooo 2024:GAU-AS:11338 ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oCRP(IO)/478/2024o MOHIToSETHIYAoANDoANRo S/OoSRIoASHOKoSETHIYA,oR/OoARIHANToVILLA,oBYEoLANEo3A,oABC,o TARUNoNAGAR,oDISPUR,oGUWAHATI-781005,oDIST-oKAMRUPo(M),oASSAM 2:oSANDIPoKUMARoDUGAR oS/OoSRIoBINODoKUMARoDUGAR oP/R/OoLOANoOFFICEoLANE oDHUBRI-783301 oDIST-oDHUBRI oASSAMoANDoP/R/AoFLAToNO.o1oB oACHYUToAPARTMENT oNILOMANIoPHUKANoPATH oCHRISTIANoBASTI oGUWAHATI-781005 oDIST-oKAMRUPo(M) oASSAo VERSUSo CHIRANJEEBoSARAMAoROYo S/OoLATEoCHITTAoRANJANoSARMAoROY,oR/OoHOUSEoNO.o88,oABC,oTARUNo NAGAR,oMAINoROAD,oGUWAHATI-781005,oDIST-oKAMRUPo(M),oASSAM AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMR.oAoKABRA,o AdvocateoforotheoRespondento:o,oo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MALASRI NANDI

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.