VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Md Imran Hussain v. The State of Assam

Dismissed
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
25 November 2024
Bench
Manash Ranjan Pathakauthor
Case no.
AB 2872/2024

Judgment

ORDER 26-11-2024 Heard Mr. A. A. Dewan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B. Sarma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam for the State. Page No.# 2/3 2) Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner, namely, Md. Imran Hussain, son of Late Hazrat Ali, resident of Village-Bahalar Mukh, Police Station-Laharighat, District-Morigaon has filed this application under Section 482 BNSS seeking pre-arrest bail in Fatashil Ambari Police Station Case No. 252/2024 corresponding to G.R. No. 5596/2024, registered under Sections 318(4)/319(2)/316(2)/336(3)/304(2)/ 3(6) of BNS. 3) As per the FIR dated 09.08.2024 lodged by the Chief Manager, State Bank of India, Vinobanagar Branch, Kalapahar before the Officer-in-Charge of Fatashil Ambari Police Station, the case is that the present petitioner and some other applicants obtained loan from the SBI, Vinobanagar Branch, Kalapahar by submitting forged documents. 4) Accordingly, Fatashil Ambari Police Station Case No. 252/2024 under Sections 318(4)/319(2)/316(2)/336(3)/304(2) /3(6) of BNS, corresponding to G.R. No. 5596/2024 was registered against the present petitioner and 11 others. 5) Perused the case diary placed before the Court today by Mr. B. Sarma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam. 6) It is seen that the petitioner obtained certain forged documents from the arrested accused persons of the case, like I-Card, Salary Slip of Environment and Forest Department of the State and others, placed those forged document before the SBI, Vinobanagar Branch, Kalapahar and fraudulently obtained Rs.8,25,000/- as loan from the said branch of the SBI, manipulating the officials of the Bank concerned. 7) Though the petitioner submitted that he is regularly repaying the loan, but on enquiry the petitioner could not submit any document regarding regular payment of loan to the Bank duly issued by it before the Court. Page No.# 3/3 8) Considering the materials in the case diary and the involvement of the petitioner in the alleged crime of obtaining loan from the SBI, Vinobanagar Branch, Kalapahar in fraudulent manner, the Court is of the view that it is not a fit case to grant pre-arrest bail to the petitioner, named above, in said Fatashil Ambari Police Station Case No. 252/2024. 9) Accordingly, this pre-arrest bail application of the petitioner, namely, Md. Imran Hussain in said Fatashil Ambari Police Station Case No. 252/2024 stands rejected. 10) Return the case diary.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010234972024 2024:GAU-AS:11704 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2872/2024 MD IMRAN HUSSAIN S/O LT. HAZRAT ALI R/O VILL- BAHALAR MUKH P.O.-LUCHANA BORI P.S.-LAHARIGHAT DIST- MORIGAON (ASSAM) PIN-782126 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR A A DEWAN Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.