VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Nashir Uddin Ahmed and 28 Ors v. The State of Assam and 7 Ors

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
1 December 2024
Bench
Lanusungkum Jamirauthor
Case no.
WP(C) 5529/2024

Judgment

ORDER Date : 02.12.2024

Heard Mr. B. D. Das, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. D. Bania, learned counsel for the petitioners.

¶2Ms. S. Chutia, learned Standing Counsel, appears for the Elementary Education Department; Mr. U. Sharma, learned Standing Counsel, appears for the Secondary Education Department and Mr. R. Borpujari, learned Standing Counsel, appears on behalf of the Finance Department.

¶3Similarly situated persons like the present petitioners had earlier approached this Court by filling WP(C) No. 4892/2021 and other connected writ petitions seeking for a declaration that they are entitled to the Old Pension Scheme and not the New Pension Scheme. The said writ petitions were dismissed by Judgment & Order dated 31.03.2023, holding that the petitioners therein were not entitled to get pensions under the Old Pension Scheme.

¶4Being aggrieved, those petitioners filed Writ Appeal before the Hon'ble Division Bench and the lead case was registered as WA No. 188/2023. The Writ Appeals were accordingly, disposed of on 26.07.2024 with the following observations and directions:- "It is informed that in a meeting took place between the Hon'ble Chief Minister of Assam with Assam Karmachari Parisahd, held on 15/03/2024, it is decided that the Government of Assam will consider extending the benefit of old pension scheme to those employees who joined the Government services after January, 2005 Page No.# 10/11 but the recruitment process of the concerned post was started prior to January, 2005 in line with the Office Memorandum issued by the Central Government. Learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that all the appellants were appointed in the year 2001 and, therefore, their case comes within the ambit of aforesaid decision of the meeting. It is further submitted that the issue regarding extending the benefit of old pension scheme to those employees, who joined the Government services after 2005 wherein, the recruitment process was started prior to 2005, is pending with the Administrative Department. In view of the above development, we are of the view that once the State Government has decided to consider the demand of the employees, who were though appointed after 2005 wherein, the recruitment process of the concerned posts were started prior to January, 2005, despite the order passed by the learned Single Judge, it would be appropriate to dispose of these appeals, awaiting the decision of the State Government on this issue. It is made clear that if the appellants failed to get any favourable decision from the State Government, they are free to approach this Court again by filing fresh writ appeals. We hope that the Government shall take a decision expeditiously, preferably within a period of 6 (six) months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order."

Page No.# 11/11

¶5The present petitioners before this Court also claim that they are equally situated and circumstanced with the appellants in Writ Appeal No. 188/2023 and other analogous Writ Appeals.

¶6This Court, after considering the above facts, is also of the considered opinion that the case of the present petitioners are equally situated and circumstanced with the appellants in Writ Appeal No. 188/2023 and analogous Writ Appeals.

¶7Accordingly, this writ petition is also disposed of in terms of the observations and directions made by the Hon'ble Division Bench in Writ Appeal No. 188/2023 by the Order dated 26.07.2024.

¶8However, it is made clear that the time period of 6 (six) months granted by the Hon'ble Division Bench by Order dated 26.07.2024 passed in WA No. 188/2023 and other analogous Writ Appeals, shall start in case of the present petitioners from the date of production of a certified copy of the Order of this Court.

¶9With the above observations and directions, this writ petition is disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

PageoNo.#o1/11 GAHC010223332024 ooooooo 2024:GAU-AS:12104 ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/5529/2024o NASHIRoUDDINoAHMEDoANDo28oORSo AGEDoABOUTo48oYEARS,o S/O.oSAHABoUDDINoAHMED,o R/O.oVILLAGEoBHIMAPARAo P.O.oHATSINGIMARI,o DISTRICToSOUTHoSALMARAoMANKACHAR,oASSAM,oPINoCODEo783135o ASSISTANToTEACHERoOFoCHARoSELLAKANDIoL.P.oSCHOOL 2:oAMINULoISLAMoMANDAL oAGEDoABOUTo56oYEARS oS/O.oSIRAZULoHOQUEoMONDAL oR/O.oVILLAGEoKHALISAMARI oP.O.oPIAZBARI oP.S.oSUKCHAR ASSISTANToTEACHERoOFoPIAZBARIoB.M.oHIGHoSCHOOL oKHALISAMARIo(AMALGAMATED) 3:oUMMEoKULSOM oAGEDoABOUTo49oYEARS oW/O.oBAHARULoISLAM oR/O.oVILLAGEoBEPARIPARA oP.O.oANDoP.S.oMANKACHAR ASSISTANToTEACHERoOFoA.A.oLATIFoGIRLSoINSTITUTION o(AMALGAMATED). 4:oRINKUoDAS ooAGEDoABOUTo56oYEARS oS/O.oLATEoBHABANIoCHANDRAoDAS PageoNo.#o2/11 oR/O.oVILLAGEoBARMANoPARA oP.O.oANDoP.S.oMANKACHAR ASSISTANToTEACHERoOFo2oNO.oPUBERGAONoL.P.oSCHOOL 5:oMONIRUZZAMANoSARKAR oAGEDoABOUTo55oYEARS oS/O.oBASHURoUDDINoSARKAR oR/O.oVILLAGEoDAKUAMARI oP.O.oANDoP.S.oSUKCHAR ASSISTANToTEACHERoOFoGOTABARIoMEoSCHOOL. 6:oNIGAMAoNANDAoHAJONG oAGEDoABOUTo32oYEARS oS/O.oNITYANANDAoHAJONG oR/O.oVILLAGEoBHANGRAoBIL oP.O.oKALAPANI oP.S.oMANKACHAR ASSISTANToTEACHERoOFo1336oNO.oBARMATIAoL.P.oSCHOOL. 7:oSUDHARoHAJONG oAGEo55oYEARS oS/O.oSUKESHoCHANDRAoHAJONG oR/O.oVILLAGEoDIPKAIoDALBARI oP.O.oKALAPANI oP.S.oMANKACHAR HEADoTEACHERoOFo1932oNO.oDALBARIoL.P.oSCHOOL. 8:oHAFIZURoRAHMANoSHEIKH oAGEDoABOUTo55oYEARS oS/O.oASRABoALIoSHEIKH oR/O.oVILLAGEoKOKRADANGAoPARTo-oIIIo P.O.oKOKRADANGA oP.S.oSUKCHARo DISTRICToSOUTHoSALMARAoMANKACHAR PageoNo.#o3/11 ASSISTANToTEACHERoOFoSEWRAGURIoM.V.oSCHOOL. 9:oMDoNURZAMAN oAGEo51oYEARS oS/O.oMDoHIKMOToALIo R/O.oVILLAGEoFEKAMARIoPARToIIo P.O.oKANAIMARA oP.S.oSOUTHoSALMARA ASSISTANToTEACHERoOFoKANAIMARAoHIGHoSCHOOL o(AMALGAMATED). 10:oABUoMOFIALoSHEIKH ooAGEo57oYEARS oS/O.oLATEoMEDUoSHEIKHo R/O.oVILLAGEoFAKIRPARA oP.O.oSUKCHAR oP.S.oSUKCHARo DISTRICToSOUTHoSALMARAoMANKACHAR HEADoTEACHERoOFo1289oNO.oFAKIRPARAoL.P.oSCHOOL 11:oMDoABDULoZOUL ooAGEo58oYEARS oS/O.oANSARoALI oR/O.oVILLAGEoBHATIoJHAGRARoCHAR oP.O.oKAKRIPARA oP.S.oMANKACHAR HEADoTEACHERoOFoSADURTILAoBoL.P.oSCHOOL. 12:oBISWAJIToGHOSH oAGEo49oYEARS oS/O.oNARAYANoCHANDRAoGHOSH oR/O.oVILLAGEoKACHARIPARA oP.O.oANDoP.S.oMANKACHAR ASSISTANToTEACHERoOFoGOURoHARIoVIDYAMANDIRoM.E.oSCHOOL oBORKONA. 13:oGONDHARUoHAJONG PageoNo.#o4/11 oAGEo53oYEARS oS/O.oGOYANATHoHAJONG oR/O.oVILLAGEoNARIBHITAo P.O.oKALAPANI oP.S.oMANKACHAR ASSISTANToTEACHERoOFoCHOMRASALIoM.E.oSCHOOL. 14:oREAZULoISLAM oAGEo58oYEARS oS/O.oGOLAMoSARWARoMONDAL oR/O.oVILLAGEoFEKAMARI oP.O.oFEKAMARI oP.S.oSOUTHoSALMARA ASSISTANToTEACHERoOFoFULERCHARoM.E.oSCHOOL. 15:oSHAHZAMALoAKAND ooAGEo51oYEARS oS/O.oABDULoMOZID oR/O.oVILLAGEoNAYAGAON oP.O.oJHOWDANGA oP.S.oMANKACHAR ASSISTANToTEACHERoOFoJOHWDANGAoM.E.oSCHOOL 16:oLANKESWARoBARMAN oAGEo57oYEARS oS/O.oSADARAMoBARMAN oR/O.oVILLAGEoKOKRADANGAoPARTo-oIIIo P.O.oKOKRADANGA oP.S.oSUKCHAR ASSISTANToTEACHERoOFo142oNO.oPECHARKANDIoL.P.oSCHOOL. 17:oNURIZAoBEGUM ooAGEo57oYEARS oC/O.oGOLAMoRASUL oR/O.oVILLAGEo2oNO.oPUBERoGAON oP.O.oANDoP.S.oMANKACHAR PageoNo.#o5/11 ASSISTANToTEACHERoOFo934oNO.o G.C.oL.P.oSCHOOL. 18:oANIMESHoCHANDRAoDAS oAGEDoABOUTo55oYEARS oS/O.oKHAGENDRAoCH.oKINNOR oR/O.oVILLAGEoMAHAMAYAoNAGAR oP.O.oHATSINGIMARI oP.S.oSOUTHoSALMARA ASSISTANToTEACHERoOFoB.M.B.oM.E.oSCHOOL oBHUTIADANGA 19:oHASINULoISLAM oAGEo54oYEARS oS/O.oREZAULoKARIM oR/O.oVILLAGEoBHUTIADANGA oP.O.oANDoP.S.oSUKCHAR ASSISTANToTEACHERoOFoB.M.B.oM.E.oSCHOOL oBHUTIADANGA. 20:oRIBADULoHOQUE ooAGEo56oYEARS oS/O.oLATEoABDULoJOULoSARKAR oR/O.oVILLAGEoDAKERGAONo P.O.oANDoP.S.oMANKACHAR HEADoTEACHERoOFo1940oNO.oBHATIoJHAGRARoCHARoL.P.oSCHOOL. 21:oKOSOMoALI ooAGEo58oYEARS oS/O.oLATEoTOFIZoUDDIN oR/O.oVILLAGEoSADULLABARI oP.O.oKALAPANI oP.S.oMANKACHAR PageoNo.#o6/11 HEADoTEACHERoOFo2230oNO.oBAISHABARIoL.P.oSCHOOL. 22:oMOZAMMELoHOQUE ooAGEo53oYEARS oS/O./oLATEoROBIoDEWANI oR/O.oVILL

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.