VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Smti. Chayanika Kashyap and 4 Ors v. The State of Assam

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
2 December 2024
Bench
Manash Ranjan Pathakauthor
Case no.
AB 1611/2024

Judgment

ORDER 03-12-2024 Heard Mr. H K Das, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. K K Parashar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam for the State.

¶2Apprehending their arrest, the petitioners, namely, (i) Smti. Chayanika Kashyap, daughter of Sri Atul Ch. Kalita; (ii) Sri Nilutpol Gogoi, son of Sri Dilip Kumar Gogoi; (iii) Smti. Massar Borah, daughter of Sri Mrigen Ch. Borah; (iv) Sri Santanu Chakraborty, son of Sri Nripen Chakravorty and (v) Smti. Sonia Rabha, daughter of Mohendra Rabha have filed this application under Section 438 CrPC, seeking pre arrest bail in Dispur Police Station Case No. 538/2024 registered under Sections 406/420 of IPC, corresponding to G.R. No. 3167/2024.

¶3The complainants on 31.05.2024 lodged the FIR of the case before the Officer-in-Page No.# 3/4 Charge of Dispur Police Station alleging that the accused persons of the case had entered into an agreement with them in the name of Vihaan QNet, but they had malafide intentions in terms of international business opportunities by showing them false benefits from the business and their working model, for which they had invested huge amounts, but did not receive the benefits in terms of the agreement they had executed with the accused persons of the case.

¶4The Court by order dated 21.06.2024 granted interim bail to the petitioners, pursuant to which, they appeared before the concerned Investigating Officer of the case and their statements were accordingly recorded.

¶5On being enquired, Mr. Parashar, learned APP, Assam from the case diary has submitted that the petitioners are regularly appearing before the concerned I.O. of the case and are cooperating with the instigation of the case, though there are incriminating materials against them as the agreements were signed in the name of the company Vihaan QNet whereas the money of the complainants were received by the petitioners in their personal accounts.

¶6Considering such materials in the case diary, the Court is of the view that custodial detention of the petitioners is not warranted for investigation of said Dispur P.S. Case No. 538/2024. As such, this pre arrest bail application of the petitioners is accepted.

¶7Accordingly, the interim pre-arrest bail granted to the petitioners on 21.06.2024 in said Dispur P.S. Case No. 538/2024, is hereby made absolute, subject to the compliance of the terms and conditions as specified in the said order dated 21.06.2024 and on compliance of the following conditions that the petitioners – (i) shall not hamper with the investigation, or tamper with the evidence of the case; (ii) shall not leave the territorial jurisdiction of Dispur Police Station, without obtaining prior written permission from the concerned Investigating Officer of the case and (iii) shall not involve themselves in any criminal activities in future.

¶8Any violation of the aforesaid terms and conditions as well as the terms and conditions as specified in the order dated 21.06.2024, noted above, by the petitioners, named above, the pre-arrest bail granted to them in the aforementioned Dispur P.S. Case No. 538/2024 shall stand automatically vacated. Page No.# 4/4

¶9This pre-arrest bail application accordingly stands disposed of.

¶10Return the case diary herewith.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

PageoNo.#o1/4 GAHC010124872024 ooooooo 2024:GAU-AS:12220 ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oAB/1611/2024o SMTI.oCHAYANIKAoKASHYAPoANDo4oORS.o D/OoSRIoATULoCH.oKALITA,oR/OoHOUSEoNO.o11,oSHANTIBANoPATH,o HATIGAON,oGUWAHATI,oPIN-781038,oDIST-oKAMRUPo(M),oASSAM 2:oNILUTPOLoGOGOI oS/OoSRIoDILIPoKUMARoGOGOI oR/OoVILL-oHOUSEoNO.o8 oMOITREEoNAGAR oOPPOSITEoBURHAoMASJID oDAKHINGAON oKAHILIPARA oGUWAHATI oPIN-7811019 oDIST-oKAMRUPo(M) oASSAM 3:oSMTI.oMASSARoBORAH oD/OoSRIoMRIGENoCH.oBORAH oR/OoHOUSEoNO.o302 oHILLoVIEWoAPARTMENT oAMBIKARIoNAGAR oAKASHIoPATH oZOOoROAD oGUWAHATI oPIN-781019 oDIST-oKAMRUPo(M) oASSAM 4:oSANTANUoCHAKRABORTY oS/OoSRIoNRIPENoCHAKRAVORTY oR/OoNEARoPBDoH.S.oSCHOOL oBARKHALA oDEHAR oKUCHI Page No.# 2/4 PIN-781350 DIST- NALBARI ASSAM 5: SMTI. SONIA RABHA D/O MOHENDRA RABHA R/O VILL AND P.O.-PHOTAMATI P.S.-TIKRIKILLA PIN-794109 DIST-WEST GARO HILLS MEGHALAY VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR H K DAS, MR N K SARMA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MR. K KALITA(INFORMANT),MR. I H SAIKIA(INFORMANT) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.