- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 3 December 2024
- Bench
- Manash Ranjan Pathak
- Case no.
- Bail Appln. 1818/2024
Judgment
ORDER 04-12-2024 Heard Ms. S. K. Nargis, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B. Sarma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam for the State.
¶2By this application filed under Section 439 CrPC, the petitioner, namely, Avdesh Kumar Roy, son of Kailash Roy, resident of Village-Nawa Nagar, P.S.-Biddupur, District-Vaishali, Bihar is seeking bail in Rangia GRPS Case No. 13/2024 registered under Sections 20(b)(ii)(c)/29 of the NDPS Act, 1985, corresponding to G.R. No. 145/2024, wherein, he was arrested on 13.02.2024 and in custody since then.
¶3The petitioner has filed this bail application on 19.06.2024.
¶4The Court by order dated 24.06.2024 called for the case diary and by another order dated 31.07.2024 called for the scanned copy of the records of the case, as it was submitted that charge-sheet in the case has already been laid against the petitioner.
¶5The Court of learned Special Judge (NDPS), Rangia, Kamrup, after the order of the Court dated 31.07.2024, immediately forwarded the scanned copy of the records of NDPS Case No. 24/2024 arising out of said Rangia GRPS Case No. 13/2024 that contains order only upto 29.07.2024. However, the charge-sheet in the case filed by the authority concerned in the said Rangia GRPS Case No. 13/2024 is not available in the case records.
¶6From the order dated 29.07.2024, passed by the learned Special Judge (NDPS), Rangia, Kamrup in said NDPS Case No. 24/2024, it is seen that cognizance under Sections 20(b)(ii)(C)/29 of the NDPS Act, 1985 has been taken against the petitioner and the other arrested accused of the case. Page No.# 3/3
¶7It is submitted by Ms. Nargis, learned counsel for the petitioner that 09.12.2024 is the date fixed for framing of charge.
¶8On instruction of the petitioner, Ms. S. K. Nargis, learned counsel prays for withdrawal of this bail application, to which Mr. B. Sarma, learned Addl. PP, Assam has no objection.
¶9Prayer is allowed.
¶10Accordingly, this bail application stands dismissed, on withdrawal.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010124762024 ooooooo 2024:GAU-AS:12256 ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oBailoAppln./1818/2024o AVDESHoKUMARoROYo S/OoKAILASHoROYo R/OoVILL-oNAWAoNAGAR,o P.S.oBIDDUPURo DIST.oVAISHALI,oBIHAR VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMo REPoBYoTHEoPP,oASSAM AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMS.oSoKoNARGIS,oMSoNoSULTANA,MSoSoBEGUMo AdvocateoforotheoRespondento:o,oo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.