Juga Saikia Das v. The State of Assam and Ors

PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010248192024 ooooooo 2024:GAU-AS:12825 ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oI.A.(Civil)/3740/2024o JUGAoSAIKIAoDASo W/O-oLATEoDHANIoCHANDRAoDAS,o VILL.-oNAKARI,oWARDoNO.o1,o P.O.oANDoP.S.-oNORTHoLAKHIMPUR,o DISTRICT-oLAKHIMPUR,oASSAM,o PIN-o787001. VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoANDoORSo REPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoCOMMISSIONERoANDoSECRETARYoTOoTHEo GOVERNMENToOFoASSAM,oELEMENTARYoEDUCATIONoDEPARTMENT,o DISPUR,oGUWAHATI,oPIN-o781006. 2:THEoCOMMISSIONERoANDoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVERNMENToOFo ASSAM oFINANCEoDEPARTMENT oDISPUR oGUWAHATI-o781006. 3:THEoDIRECTORoOFoELEMENTARYoEDUCATION oASSAM oKAHILIPARA oGUWAHATI-o781019. 4:THEoDISTRICToELEMENTARYoEDUCATIONoOFFICER oLAKHIMPUR oNORTHoLAKHIMPUR oPIN-o787001. 5:THEoDEPUTYoINSPECTORoOFoSCHOOLS oLAKHIMPUR Page No.# 2/3 NORTH LAKHIMPUR PIN-787001. 6:THE BLOCK ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER LAKHIMPUR EDUCATION BLOCK NORTH LAKHIMPUR PIN-787001. 7:THE ACCOUNTANT GENRERAL (A AND E) ASSAM MAIDAMGAON GUWAHATI PIN-781029. 8:THE DIRECTOR OF PENSION ASSAM HOUSEFED COMPLEX DISPUR GUWAHATI-Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M K NEOG, MR. M K NEOG Advocate for the Respondent : SC, ELEM. EDU, SC, FINANCE DEPTT.,SC, AG

BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE LANUSUNGKUM JAMIR O R D E R

17.12.2024 Heard Mr. M.K. Neog, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. P.K. Bora, learned Standing Counsel, Elementary Education Department for the opposite party Nos. 1, 3, 4, 5 and 6, Mr. B. Gogoi, learned Standing Counsel, Finance Department, Assam for the opposite party No.2 and Mr. B. Chakraborty, learned Standing Counsel, Accountant General (A&E), Assam for the opposite party No.7.

¶2By this interlocutory application, the applicant, who is the writ Page No.# 3/3 petitioner in WP(C) No.5019/2024, is praying for impleadment of the "Director of Pension, Assam, Housefed Complex, Dispur, Guwahati-781006" as party respondent No.8 in the connected writ petition on the ground that the applicant could not make the proposed respondent due to inadvertence as a party respondent in the said writ petition.

¶3The opposite parties have no objection.

¶4This Court has also considered the cause shown in the present application and is satisfied.

¶5Accordingly, the prayer for impleadment is allowed.

¶6Interlocutory application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant