- Court
- High Court of Karnataka
- Decided
- 28 November 2025
- Bench
- C M Joshi
- Case no.
- CP 100186/2025
Follow Karnataka High CourtFollow C M Joshi
Judgment
NC:(2025:KHC-D:16659( CP(No.(100186(of(2025( ( , ,,HC-KAR( ( ( IN(THE(HIGH(COURT(OF(KARNATAKA,AT(DHARWAD(
THDATED(THIS(THE(28 (DAY(OF(NOVEMBER,(2025(
BEFORE( THE(HON'BLE(MR.(JUSTICE(C(M(JOSHI(
CIVIL(PETITION(NO.100186(OF(2025((
BETWEEN:(( ( SMT.,KAVITA,, W/O.,VRUSHABHA,MALAGOUDANAVAR,, AGE:,37,YEARS,,OCC.,HOUSEWIFE,, R/O.,C/O.,CHINNAPPA,KURBAPPA,MARENNAVAR,, AT,/,POST:,DEVLAPUR,,TAL.,BAILHONGAL,,
DIST.,BELAGAVI., …PETITIONER, (BY,SRI.,KRISHNAKUMAR,JOSHI,,ADVOCATE,FOR, ,,,,,,SRI.,,SANGRAM,S.,KULKARNI,,ADVOCATE), ,
AND:( ( SHRI,VRUSHABHA,MAHAVIR,MALAGOUDANAVAR, AGE:,40,YEARS,,OCC.,SERVICE,IN,ARMY,, R/O.,YELIMUNNALI,,TAL.,HUKKERI,,
DIST.,BELAGAVI,, Digitally signedtiby YASHAVANT PRESENTLY,RESIDING,AT,NO.15331350Y,, YASHAVANT NARAYANKAR NARAYANKAR Date: RANK,HAVALDAR,NAME,VRASHABHA,,M.M.,UNIT,,, 2025.12.02 +0530 15,ENGR,REGT,(BHATINDA,CANT), COY,434,,FD,COY,,C/O.,56,APO,,PIN-914015., …RESPONDENT, (RESPONDENT-HELD,SUFFICIENT), , , CIVIL, PETITION, FILED, U/SEC.24, OF, CPC,, PRAYING, TO, TRANSFER,THE,MATRIMONIAL,CASE,BEARING,NO.60/2025,FROM,THE, COURT,OF,SR.,CIVIL,JUDGE,,HUKKERI,TO,THE,COURT,OF,SR.,CIVIL, JUDGE,AND,JMFC,,BAILHONGAL,,IN,THE,INTEREST,OF,MEETING,THE, ENDS,OF,JUSTICE., , , THIS, PETITION,, COMING, ON, FOR, ORDERS, THIS, DAY,, ORDER, WAS,MADE,THEREIN,AS,UNDER:,
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI)
The respondent has refused to receive the notice issued by this Court as per the postal endorsement. Therefore, service of notice is held sufficient.
¶2Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant.
¶3The respondent has not appeared despite service of notice.
¶4The petitioner is the wife of the respondent. The petitioner states that her marriage with the respondent had solemnized on 06.06.2010 and out of such marriage, the petitioner has two children aged 12 and 14 years, who are staying with her. It is contended that due to the differences between the petitioner and the respondent, the respondent has filed M.C.No.60/2025 before the learned Senior Civil Judge, Hukkeri for dissolution of the marriage. It is stated that the petitioner has filed Crl.Misc.No.219/2025 before the learned Senior Civil Judge and J.M.F.C., Bailhongal under Section 144 of the B.N.S.S. seeking maintenance. Therefore, the petitioner
contends that the M.C.No.60/2025 pending before the learned Senior Civil Judge, Hukkeri be transferred to the learned Senior Civil Judge and J.M.F.C., Bailhongal so that both the matters are heard by one and the same Court.
¶5This Court in the case Smt. M. V. Rekha vs. Sri Sathya @ Suraj1 at paragraph No.15 has held as hereunder: "The cardinal principle for exercise of power under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure is that ends of justice demand the transfer of the suit, appeal or other proceeding. In matrimonial matters, wherever Courts are called upon to consider the plea of transfer, the Courts have to take into consideration the economic soundness of either of the parties, the social strata of the spouses and behavioural pattern, their standard of life antecedent to marriage and subsequent thereon and the circumstances of either of the parties in eking out their livelihood and under whose protective umbrella they are seeking their sustenance to life. Generally, it is the wife's convenience which must be looked at while considering transfer. Further, when two proceedings in different Courts which raise common question of fact and law and when the decisions are interdependent, it is desirable that
1 ILR 2010 KAR 5407
they should be tried together by the same Judge so as to avoid multiplicity in trial of the same issues and conflict of decisions (See Smt.NandaKishori v. S.B.Shiua Prakash AIR 1993 Kar 87, Sumita Singh v. Kumar Sanjay and Anr. AIR 2002 SC 396 and Smt.Swarna Gouri v. Sri Vinayak Pujar ILR 2007 Kar 4561)."
(emphasis supplied)
¶6In view of the same, the petition deserves to be allowed. Hence, the following: ORDER
i) The petition is allowed.
ii) The petition in M.C.No.60/2025 pending before the learned Senior Civil Judge, Hukkeri is hereby withdrawn and transferred to the Court of the learned Senior Civil Judge and J.M.F.C. Bailhongal for disposal in accordance with law.
iii) Intimate both the Courts accordingly.
SD/- (C M JOSHI) JUDGE
SSP CT:PA LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 4
Source: High Court of Karnataka, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.