VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2025 › High Court of Madras

P.Kannappan v. The Chairman

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
17 July 2025
Bench
M. Sundarauthor, Hemant Chandangoudar
Case no.
WP 20561/2021

Follow Madras High CourtFollow M. SundarFollow Hemant Chandangoudar

Judgment

O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by M. SUNDAR, J.] This order will now dispose of the captioned 'Writ Petition' ['WP' for the sake of brevity].

¶2Mr.R.Muthukumar, learned counsel on record for writ petitioner, Mr.B.Balaji, learned counsel representing Mr.S.Karthikeyan, learned Standing Counsel for R1 & R2 and Mr.S.Pushpakaran, learned counsel for R3 & R4 are before us. Page Nos.2/7

¶3Adverting to a representation dated 27.08.2021 from the writ petitioner, learned counsel for writ petitioner submitted that there is alleged encroachment in 'Plot No.41, 20th Cross Street, Jothiammal Nagar - I, T.P.Chatram, Chennai-600 030' [hereinafter 'said land' for the sake of convenience and clarity] by R3 & R4 before us. To be noted, R3 & R4 are private respondents.

¶4Considering the facts and circumstances of the case in juxtaposition with 'G.O.(Ms)No.64, Revenue and Disaster Management Department, Land Disposal Wing, dated 08.02.2022' {hereinafter 'said GO' for the sake of convenience} which puts in place a removal of encroachment procedure inter-alia giving opportunity to alleged encroachers, we are of the view that the captioned WP can be disposed of with consent of both sides by putting in a safety valve / adequate protection qua alleged encroachers i.e., R3 & R4. Page Nos.3/7

¶5In the light of what has been alluded to supra and considering the limited scope of the captioned WP, with the consent of both sides, captioned WP was taken up.

¶6It was submitted by learned State counsel that said GO has been put in place, wherein and whereby Divisional Monitoring Committee, District Monitoring Committee and State Steering Committee have been constituted inter alia for a single point reporting / monitoring system qua Government lands.

¶7In the light of the narrative thus far, we deem it appropriate to refer the matter to the District Monitoring Committee headed by the District Collector, Chennai qua said GO.

¶8This Court directs the jurisdictional District Monitoring Committee to examine if there is encroachment qua said land.

Page Nos.4/7

¶9The District Monitoring Committee qua said GO shall (if it comes to the conclusion that there is encroachment) report the encroachment to appropriate authorities concerned for further action (for removal of encroachment). To be noted, all the rights and contentions of alleged encroachers are preserved for being raised before the Committee concerned which shall consider the same on their own merits and in accordance with law untrammelled by this proceedings in this Court. The entire exercise shall be completed within a period of 14 weeks from today i.e., by

23.10.2025.

¶10It is open to the writ petitioner and or anyone concerned with this matter to come to this Court on the same issue even with a similar / same prayer if there is any change of circumstances.

¶11We make it clear that we have not expressed any view or opinion as to whether there is encroachment or not qua said land as it turns on facts and it is for the District Monitoring Committee to take a call on this aspect of the matter. We also make it clear that this exercise will not apply to patta Page Nos.5/7 land and it will apply only to public land, if there is any encroachment in public land.

¶12Captioned WP is disposed of with the aforementioned observations and directives in the aforesaid manner. Consequently, connected Writ Miscellaneous Petition is disposed of as closed. There shall be no order as to costs. (M.S.J.,) (H.C.J.,)

17.07.2025 Index : Yes / No Speaking / Non-speaking mk To

¶1The Chairman Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board No.5, Kamarajar Street Chennai-600 005.

¶2The Estate Officer Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board Estate Office 5, T.P.Chatram Chennai-600 010.

¶3The District Collector Chennai. Page Nos.6/7 M.SUNDAR, J., and HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J., mk

17.07.2025 Page Nos.7/7

Case details

Parties and counsel

2025:MHC:1709 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 17.07.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR and W.M.P.No.21941 of 2021 Mr.P.Kannappan S/o.Ponnusamy ... Petitioner vs. 1. The Chairman Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board No.5, Kamarajar Street Chennai-600 005. 2. The Estate Officer Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board Estate Office 5, T.P.Chatram Chennai-600 010. 3. Ranjitham W/o.Ganesan 4. P.Ganesan S/o.Pattabi Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to initiate Page Nos.1/7 proceedings on the petitioner's application dated 27.08.2021 and restrained illegal activities of the respondents 3 and 4 and take action against the respondents 3 and 4 as contemplated under Sectio 65 of the Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board Act. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Muthukumar For Respondents : Mr.B.Balaji for Mr.S.Karthikeyan Standing Counsel for R1 & R2 Mr.S.Pushpakaran for R3 & R4 *****

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.