VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2025 › High Court of Madras

P.Vasanthi, v. Inspector General of Registration Cum Secretary to Government (Revenue),

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
3 November 2025
Bench
S.M. Subramaniamauthor, Mohammed Shaffiq
Case no.
WA 3189/2025

Follow Madras High CourtFollow S.M. SubramaniamFollow Mohammed Shaffiq

Judgment

J U D G M E N T (Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.)

The present intra-Court appeal has been instituted to assail the writ order dated 20.01.2025 made in W.P.No.25290 of 2024.

¶2The writ petitioner is the appellant before this Court. Writ Petition has been instituted seeking direction to respondents 1 to 5 to take befitting action in terms of the Registration Act and the Transfer of Property Act against (1) the power agent by name M.Seenu @ Natarajan and his legal heirs (2) the document writer by name C.Siva @ Sivasankaran License No.280, No.72, Perumal Koil Street, Puducherry and (3) the Sub-Registrar, Puducherry, who registered the same and to cancel sale deed No.3837 of 2004 dated

01.09.2004 and the subsequent registered document also.

¶3Writ Court considered the nature of relief sought for, the scope of adjudication of civil rights and consequently dismissed the Writ Petition. To reiterate the principles, disputed facts cannot be adjudicated by Writ Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Civil rights are to be established before competent civil Court in the manner known to law. The relief sought for in Writ Petition is not entertainable, since it involves adjudication of civil rights between parties.

¶4Thus, this Court does not find any infirmity or perversity in respect of the findings and the decision made by the writ Court. Consequently, present Writ Appeal stands dismissed. However, in the event of instituting any civil suit, the civil Court has to consider the issues independently based on the documents and evidence and uninfluenced by any of the observations made by writ Court on facts. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. (S.M.S., J.) (M.S.Q., J.)

03.11.2025 dsa Index :Yes/No :Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order To

1.Inspector General of Registration-Cum – Secretary to Government (Revenue), Chief Secretariat, Goubert Avenue, Puducherry.

2.The Senior Superintendent of Police (Law & Order), Orleanpet Police Station Campus, Puducherry.

3.The District Registrar, Office of the District Registrar, Kamaraj Salai, Sakthi Nagar, Saram, Puducherry – 605 013.

4.The Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti Corruption Unit, Muthialpet, Puducherry – 605 003.

5.The Superintendent of Police, CBCID, Nellithoppe SO, Puducherry.

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. and

MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J. dsa W.A.No. 3189 of 2025

03.11.2025

Case details

Parties and counsel

2025:MHC:2521 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03.11.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ W.A.No. 3189 of 2025 and C.M.P.No.25975 of 2025 P.Vasanthi ...Appellant Vs. 1.Inspector General of Registration- Cum – Secretary to Government (Revenue), Chief Secretariat, Goubert Avenue, Puducherry. 2.The Senior Superintendent of Police (Law & Order), Orleanpet Police Station Campus, Puducherry. 3.The District Registrar, Office of the District Registrar, Kamaraj Salai, Sakthi Nagar, Saram, Puducherry – 605 013. 4.The Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti Corruption Unit, Muthialpet, Puducherry – 605 003. 5.The Superintendent of Police, CBCID, Nellithoppe SO, Puducherry. M.Srinivasan @ Natarajan (Died) 6.Parvathy 7.N.Drga Preethi 8.N.Grishmitasri 9.N.Sivashree 10.G.Prabavathy 11.G.Ragavendar 12.J.Priya 13.C.Siva @ Sivasankaran ...Respondents PRAYER: The Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent praying to set aside the order dated 20.01.2025 made in W.P.No.25290 of 2024. For Appellant : Mr.P.V.Balasubramanian, Senior Counsel For Mr.Prakash Adiapadam For Respondents : Mr.M.Ravi For M/s.Babu Rangasamy Associates for R13 *****

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.