VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Meghalaya High Court 2025 › High Court of Meghalaya

M/S Inderjit Mehta Construction Pvt Ltd v. The Union of India and Anr

Disposed Off
Court
High Court of Meghalaya
Decided
27 June 2025
Bench
H. S. Thangkhiew, Judge
Case no.
Arb.P. 3/2025

Judgment

Serial No. 01 Supplementary List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG

Arb.P. No. 3 of 2025

Date of Decision: 27.06.2025

M/s Inderjit Mehta Construction Private Limited

:::Petitioner

-Vs-

1.Union of India (Through Military Engineer Services, Chief Engineer (AF) Shillong Zone, Shillong)

2.The Engineer-in-Chief, Military Engineer Services HQ of Ministry of Defence

(Army), Kashmir House, Rajaji Marg, New Delhi – 110011

:::Respondents

Coram:

Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew, Judge

Appearance: For the Petitioner/Appellant(s) : Mrs. P.D.B.Baruah, Sr. Adv. with

Mr. B.A. Wanswett, Adv.

For the Respondent(s) : Dr. N. Mozika, DSGI with

Ms. M. Myrchiang, Adv.

i) Whether approved for reporting in

Law journals etc.:

ii) Whether approved for publication in press:

Oral:

¶1The present petition has been filed under Section 11(5) and 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, read with the appointment of Arbitrators by the High Court of Meghalaya Scheme 2017.

¶2On a dispute that has arisen from a contract agreement between the petitioner and the respondents No. 1 and 2, the petitioner as per Clause - 70 of the General Conditions of Contract, IAFW 2249, which is an arbitration clause, whereby provision has been made for reference to a sole arbitrator, had requested the respondents for invocation of Clause – 70. However, on the delay on the part of the respondents, the instant petition has been filed for issuance of appropriate orders from this Court for appointment of a sole Arbitrator.

¶3Mrs. P.D.B. Baruah, learned Senior counsel assisted by Mr. B.A. Wanswett, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the respondents having not appointed an Arbitrator from the panel of Arbitrators i.e. panel of the Ministry of Defence and panel of CPWD within 30(thirty) days' have waived their right, which have necessitated the filing

of the instant application under Section 11(5) and 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The learned Senior counsel has submitted before the Court a suggested list of the names of 3(three) Arbitrators, who are in the panel of the Ministry of Defence and CPWD, and has further prayed that Shri. Sorabh Mathur, Jt. Dg. (Rtd.) MES, be appointed as the sole Arbitrator.

¶4Dr. N. Mozika, learned DSGI for the respondents has also produced a list of empanelled Arbitrators dated 13.04.2023, and further submits that the sole Arbitrator may be appointed from the said list.

¶5Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The respondents having not appointed a sole Arbitrator within the stipulated time, by operation of Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, the names as suggested by the petitioner is therefore taken into consideration and Serial No. 2 thereof, namely Shri. Sorabh Mathur, Jt. Dg. (Rtd.) MES, A-201, Melodia, Kuber Complex, Gandhi Path, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur – 302021, is appointed as sole Arbitrator to adjudicate on the issues as provided under Clause – 70 of the General Conditions of Contract.

¶6Needless to add the schedule of fees as provided by the Ministry of Defence shall be applicable.

¶7As ordered above, the instant application is closed and disposed of.

Judge Meghalaya

27.06.2025 "D.Thabah-PS"

Date: 2025.06.30 04:17:08 IST

Source: High Court of Meghalaya, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.