VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Chhattisgarh High Court 2026 › High Court of Chhattisgarh

Vijay Kumar Uike v. State of Chhattisgarh

DISPOSED OFF
Court
High Court of Chhattisgarh
Decided
11 October 2026
Bench
Bibhu Datta Guruauthor
Case no.
WPS 7431/2026

Follow Chhattisgarh High CourtFollow Bibhu Datta Guru

Judgment

Order on Board 12/10/2026

¶1The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking following reliefs :- "(a) issue a writ of certiorari, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, calling for the records relating to the impugned order of suspension dated 18.02.2026 (Annexure P-7) passed by Respondent No. 3, and quash and set aside the same; JYOTI SHARMA Date: 2026.10.13 10:47:34 +0530

(b) issue a writ of mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the Respondents to forthwith reinstate the Petitioner in. service, with all consequential benefits, including the difference of full salary and subsistence allowance, seniority and continuity of service;

(c) in the alternative, and without prejudice to prayers (a) and

(b), declare that the continued suspension of the Petitioner beyond ninety days from the date of the order of suspension, without any reasoned order of extension, is illegal, and consequently direct the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner;

(d) issue an appropriate writ, order or direction directing Respondent No. 3 to consider and decide the petitioner's representation recived on 17.08.2026(Annexure P-11) within a specified time period, or in the alternative, grant liberty to the Petitioner to submit a fresh representation before the concerned authority/Respondent No. 3 with a direction to consider and decide the same in accordance with law within a time-bound period;

(e) pass any other order(s) as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice.

(e) pass any other order(s) as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice."

¶2Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner, while serving as Teacher (L.B.) was placed under suspension vide order dated 18.02.2026 and has not been revoked till date. He further submits that the petitioner has already submitted a representation dated 17.08.2026 (Annexure P-10) for redressal of his grievances and the same is still pending consideration before the competent authority. He, therefore, prays that a direction be issued to the concerned authority to consider and decide the said representation within a stipulated period.

¶3Learned State counsel submits that if the representation submitted by the petitioner is pending consideration, the same shall be examined and decided by the competent authority in accordance with law, keeping in view the applicable circulars/ instructions of the State Government as well as the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, within a reasonable period.

¶4Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.

¶5Considering the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this petition is disposed of with a direction to competent respondent to consider and decide the petitioner's representation dated 17.08.2026 in accordance with law, on its own merits, expeditiously, preferably within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶6It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the claim of the petitioner and the competent authority shall take an independent decision strictly in accordance with law.

¶7With the aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of.

Sd/- Sd/-

(Bibhu Datta Guru)

JUDGE Jyoti

Case details

Parties and counsel

CGHC010395382026 2026:CGHC:43983 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7431 of 2026 Vijay Kumar Uike S/o Shri Laxmikant Uike Aged About 39 Years Presently Working As Teacher, L.B. Grade (Mathematics), Posted At Government Upper Primary School Kantagaon, Block - Charama, District Uttar Bastar Kanker, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of School Education, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 492002 2. Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3. Joint Director, Education Division Bastar, Jagdalpur, District Bastar Chhattisgarh 4. District Education Officer District Uttar Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh 5. Block Education Officer Block Charama, District Uttar Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh 6. Block Education Officer Block Koyalibeda, District Uttar Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Yogesh Yadav, Advocate For Respondent/ State : Mr. S. S. Badgaiya, G.A. Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge

Source: High Court of Chhattisgarh, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.