VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Chhattisgarh High Court 2026 › High Court of Chhattisgarh

Satish Dani v. State of Chhattisgarh

DISPOSED OFF
Court
High Court of Chhattisgarh
Decided
14 October 2026
Bench
Amitendra Kishore Prasadauthor
Case no.
WPC 1801/2025

Follow Chhattisgarh High CourtFollow Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Judgment

Order on Board 15/10/2026

¶1The petitioner, in this Writ Petition, has prayed for the following reliefs:- "A. A writ and/or an order in the nature of writ of appropriate nature do issue commanding and PRIYANKA VERMA Digitally signed by PRIYANKA VERMA Date: 2026.10.16 +0530 directing the respondents to produce before this Hon'ble Court all the relevant records pertaining to the case of the petitioners for its kind perusal. B. A writ and/or an order in the nature of writ of appropriate nature do issue to provide compensation to the petitioner for their acquired land or deliver the vacant possession of acquired land. C. A writ and/or an order in the nature of writ of appropriate nature do issue to decide the representation of the petitioner and in violation of principles of natural justice and the respondent authorities be directed to provide the compensation to the petitioners in respect of the land. D. Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the facts & circumstances of case. E. Cost of the petition may also be awarded."

¶2Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be permitted to file an appropriate application before the concerned authorities, i.e., the RDA, respondents No. 5 and 6.

¶3Learned counsel appearing for respondents No. 5 and 6/RDA has no objection if such a limited direction is issued.

¶4Having considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, this Court is of the view that the ends of justice would be served if the petitioner is permitted to file an appropriate application before the concerned authorities. Accordingly, the petitioner is at liberty to file such an application before the concerned authorities (respondents No. 5 and 6), who shall consider the same and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law, after giving due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within 60 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶5It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.

¶6With the aforesaid observations and directions, the present petition stands disposed of.

Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad)

Judge

Priyanka

Case details

Parties and counsel

CGHC010122902025 2026:CGHC:44702 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1801 of 2025 1 - Satish Dani S/o Late Beniram Dani Aged About 62 Years R/o C-13, Sector-2, Avanti Vihar, Raipur, Tehsil And District Raipur (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Urban Administration, Mahanadi Bhavan, Capitol Complex, Naya Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Collector, Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Sub-Divisional Officer, Raipur (C.G.) 4 - The Tehsildar, Raipur (C.G.) 5 - Raipur Development Authority, Through Its Chief Executive Officer, Raipur (C.G.) 6 - Chief Executive Engineer, Raipur Development Authority, Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Ankur Agrawal, Advocate For Respondents No.5 & 6 : Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate For State : Mr. Anmol Sharma, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Source: High Court of Chhattisgarh, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.