Hemlata Shrivas v. Sanjay Kumar Netam

Judgment on Board (16.10.2026)

¶1Heard on I.A. No. 01/2024, application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, for condonation of delay.

¶2Upon due consideration and for the reasons stated in the application, I.A. No. 01/2024 is allowed. Delay of 110 days in filing the appeal is condoned.

¶3Also heard on admission.

¶4This appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short the "Act of 1988") has been preferred by the appellants/claimants seeking enhancement of the amount of compensation, challenging the impugned award dated

15.12.2023, passed in Claim Case No. 1157/2021, whereby the learned Claims Tribunal has awarded a total sum of Rs.20,63,720/- as compensation for the death of Prakash Shrivas (32-years-old) who died in a road accident which took place on 01.06.2021.

¶5Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the deceased, Prakash Shrivas, worked in a salon shop and earned Rs. 15,000/- per month; therefore, the income assessed by the Claims Tribunal at Rs. 9,200/- per month is lower and needs to be enhanced. Hence, the appeal be allowed, and the award passed by the Claims Tribunal be suitably enhanced.

¶6Learned counsel for respondent No.3/insurance company would submit that the Claims Tribunal after appreciating oral and documentary evidence available on record rightly awarded the compensation amount. Hence, the compensation awarded by the Claims Tribunal is just and proper and requires no interference.

¶7I have heard learned counsel for the parties, considered their rival submissions made herein-above and went through the records with utmost circumspection.

¶8In the case at hand, the claimant Hemlata Shrivas (AW-1), wife of the deceased, stated that the deceased worked in a salon and earned Rs. 15,000/- per month. However, the claimants did not examine any witness to substantiate this claim. As the income and nature of work of the deceased were not proved by substantial evidence, the Claims Tribunal assessed the monthly income of the deceased at Rs. 9,200/-, in accordance with the Chhattisgarh Minimum Wages Notification issued by the office of the Labour Commissioner, Chhattisgarh, for unskilled labor. Furthermore, after calculating the compensation as per law, the Tribunal awarded a total compensation of Rs. 20,63,720/- in favor of the claimants.

¶9Upon a careful consideration of the material on record, it is apparent that no credible or reliable evidence was available to establish that the deceased earned Rs. 15,000/- per month. Consequently, the income of the deceased was rightly assessed by the Claims Tribunal on the basis of the notification issued by the office of the Labour Commissioner, Chhattisgarh, for the relevant period. Thus, this Court finds that the Tribunal properly appreciated the evidence and that the compensation awarded is just and reasonable. There is no infirmity in the impugned award warranting interference.

10.Accordingly, the appeal of the appellants is hereby dismissed at the admission stage.

Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge H.L. Sahu

CGHC010178192024 2026:CGHC:44826 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 1139 of 2024 1 - Hemlata Shrivas W/o Late Prakash, Aged About 24 Years R/o Village Lakhasar, Post- Kathakoni, Thana Sakri, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) ---(Claimant) 2 - Nidhi Shrivas D/o Late Prakash, Aged About 6 Years Minor Through Legal Guardian Mother Smt. Hemlata Shrivas W/o Late Prakash Shrivas Appellant No.1 R/o Village Lakhasar, Post- Kathakoni, Thana Sakri, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) ---(Claimant) 3 - Priyal Shrivas D/o Late Prakash, Aged About 3 Years Minor Through Legal Guardian Mother Smt. Hemlata Shrivas W/o Late Prakash Shrivas Appellant No.1 R/o Village Lakhasar, Post- Kathakoni, Thana Sakri, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) ---(Claimant) 4 - Shaila Bai W/o Late Durga Shrivas, Aged About 59 Years R/o Village Chotiguda Post Raykera Tahsil Gharghoda, District Raigarh (C.G.) ---(Claimant) ... Appellants versus 1 - Sanjay Kumar Netam S/o Tijau Ram R/o Yadunandan Nagar, L.82, Post Tifra Thana- Sirgitti, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) -----(Driver Of Offending Vehicle Pickup C.G. 10/a.C./4215) 2 - Magendra Kumar Saluja S/o Paramjeet Singh R/o In Front Of D.P.Vipra Collage, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ---(Owner Of Offending Vehicle Pickup C.G.10/a.C./4215) 3 - The New India Insurance Company Limited, Through Branch Manager, Rama Trade Center, In Front Of Rajiv Plaza, City Kotwali, District Bilaspur (C.G.), ---(Insurer Of Offending Vehicle Pickup C.G.10/a.C./4215) ... Respondents by HEERA LAL SAHU Date: 2026.10.16 +0530 For Appellants/Claimants : Mr. A.L. Singroul, Advocate. For respondents No. 1 & 2 : None. For Respondent No. 3 : Mr. Raj Awasthi, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal