VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Karnataka High Court 2026 › High Court of Karnataka

Sri M S Nanjundaswamy v. Shivamogga Jilla Brahmana Mahasaba (Regd)

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Karnataka
Decided
21 February 2026
Bench
Jayant Banerjiauthor
Case no.
WP 5894/2026

Follow Karnataka High CourtFollow Jayant Banerji

Judgment

NC:(2026:KHC:10867( WP(No.(5894(of(2026( ( , ,,HC-KAR( ( ( IN(THE(HIGH(COURT(OF(KARNATAKA(AT(BENGALURU(

STDATED(THIS(THE(21 (DAY(OF(FEBRUARY,(2026(

BEFORE( THE(HON'BLE(MR.(JUSTICE(JAYANT(BANERJI( WRIT(PETITION(NO.(5894(OF(2026((GM-CPC)( BETWEEN:(( (

SRI.M.S.NANJUNDASWAMY,, SON,OF,LATE,M.SATHYANARAYANA,RAO,., AGED,ABOUT,64,YEARS,,,

RESIDING,BEHIND,RINGE,TELELINKS,,, NEAR,AUTO,STAND,,BHEEMANAKONE,ROAD,,SAGARA-577, 401,,SHIVAMOGGA,DISTRICT., …PETITIONER,

(BY,SRI.GOUTAM.R.,,ADVOCATE,FOR,, ,,,,,,SRI.SAMMITH,S.,,ADVOCATE), ,

AND:( ( SHIVAMOGGA,JILLA,BRAHMANA,MAHASABA,(REGD),,

BY,ITS,SECRETARY-SRI,B.K.VENKATESHMURTHY,,SON,OF, B.K.KESHAVAMURTHY,, Digitally AGED,ABOUT,65,YEARS,,signedtiby KAVYA0G HAVING,ITS,OFFICE,AT, Location: BRAMANA,VIDYARTHI,NILAYA,, High0Court B.H.ROAD,,SHIVAMOGGA-577,201.,of Karnataka …RESPONDENT, , THIS,WRIT,PETITION,IS,FILED,UNDER,ARTICLES,226,AND,227, OF, THE, CONSTITUTION, OF, INDIA, PRAYING, (A),, TO-CALL,FOR,THE,RECORDS,IN,O.S.NO.183/2024,FROM,THE,COURT, OF,THE,III,ADDL.,CIVIL,JUDGE,AND,JMFC,,SHIVAMOGGA.,(B),SET, ASIDE,THE,ORDER,DTD,29.03.2025,PASSED,ON,IA,NO.I,IN,O.S,NO., 183/2024,AS,CONTAINED,IN,ANNEXURE-S,AND,ETC.,,,, , THIS, PETITION,, COMING, ON, FOR, PRELIMINARY, HEARING,, THIS,DAY,,ORDER,WAS,MADE,THEREIN,AS,UNDER:,

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI

ORAL ORDER This petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:- a) Call for the records in O.S.No.183/2024 from the Court of the III Additional Civil Judge & JMFC, Shivamogga;

b) Set aside the order dated 29/03/2025 passed on I.A.No.I in O.S.No.183/2024 as contained in Annexure-S;

c) Consequently allow I.A.No.I and direct maintenance of status-quo with respect to the petitioner's membership in the respondent organization pending disposal of the suit;

d) Pass such other order/s as this Hon'ble Court deems fit in the interest of justice and equity.

¶2It appears that petitioner, who is the plaintiff, instituted Original Suit No. 183/2024 seeking a declaration of voidance of his dismissal from the membership of the dependent organization by means of a letter dated

26.07.2022. Injunction was also sought.

¶3In the aforesaid suit filed on 02.03.2024, the petitioner filed IA No.1 under Section 151 CPC seeking an ex-parte ad-interim order of stay over his illegal dismissal till disposal of the suit. Objections were filed by the defendant, where after the impugned order dated

29.03.2025 was passed. In the order impugned it is stated that the ultimate relief claimed by the plaintiff is that the order passed by the defendant organization being illegal, be declared as null and void. Therefore, the application, indirectly claiming that the order passed by the defendant organization is illegal and praying to stay the said suspension order, could not be granted as the plaintiff has to first establish that the order passed by the defendant organization is illegal. Therefore, without going to trial it was not possible to come to that conclusion. It was further noticed that, opportunity was given to the plaintiff before passing the order of removal. It was noted that at that stage, the plaintiff had failed to convince the court that the order of the defendant organization was illegal.

¶4It is noticed that the trial Court had observed to the effect that the interim order sought would amount to grant of the final relief as sought in the plaint and therefore the IA was rejected.

¶5Given the settled position of law that no such interim order can be granted which has the effect of granting the final relief sought, this Court finds no merit in this petition and it is therefore dismissed.

¶6The Registry of this Court is directed to communicate this order to the concerned trial Court/s within fifteen days from today, so that it is kept on the record.

Sd/- (JAYANT BANERJI) JUDGE

KGR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19

Source: High Court of Karnataka, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.