- Court
- High Court of Karnataka
- Decided
- 10 March 2026
- Bench
- E.S.Indiresh
- Case no.
- WP 15693/2023
Follow Karnataka High CourtFollow E.S.Indiresh
Judgment
NC:(2026:KHC:14353( WP(No.(15693(of(2023( ( , ,,HC-KAR( ( ( IN(THE(HIGH(COURT(OF(KARNATAKA(AT(BENGALURU(
THDATED(THIS(THE(10 (DAY(OF(MARCH,(2026(
BEFORE( THE(HON'BLE(MR.(JUSTICE(E.S.INDIRESH( WRIT(PETITION(NO.(15693(OF(2023((EDN-RES)( ( BETWEEN:((
(
1., PRIYADARSHINI,COLLEGE,OF,PHARMACY, NEAR,GOVENMENT,FIRST,GRADE,COLLEGE,, HANUMANTHA,,RURA,,KORATAGERE,, TUMKUR,DISTRICT,-,572,129,, REPRESENTED,BY,ITS,PRINCIPAL,, MR,,P,S,MINHAS,, S/O,MR.,B.S.MINHAS,,AGED:,51,YEARS., ,
2., PRAKRUTHI,COLLEGE,OF,PHARMACY, MADHUGIRI,ROAD,,HANUMANTHA,RURA,, KORATAGERE,,TUMKUR,DISTRICT,-,572,129,, REPRESENTED,BY,ITS,PRINCIPAL,, MR,CHANDERSHEKHARAPPA,B,V,, S/O,BYRAPPA,V,,AGED:,49,YEARS., …PETITIONERS, Digitallytisignedtiby CHAYA0S0A (BY,SRI.,ABHISHEK,MALIPATIL.,,ADVOCATE), Location:0HIGH COURT0OF AND:( KARNATAKA (
1., STATE,OF,KARNATAKA, MINISTRY,OF,HEALTH,AND,FAMILY,WELFARE,, DEPARTMENT,NO.341,,VIDHANA,SOUDHA,, BENGALURU,-,560,001, REPRESENTED,BY,ITS,SECRETARY., ,
2., BOARD,OF,EXAMINING,AUTHORITY, DRUGS,CONTROL,DEPARTMENT,, C/O,GOVERNMENT,COLLEGE,OF,PHARMACY,,
SUBBAIAH CIRCLE, P KALINGA RAO ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 027 REPRESENTED BY ITS MEMBER SECRETARY …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.SUKANYA BALIGA.B., AGA)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER NO.2023-24 DATED 12/05/203 PASSED BY THE R2 ALONG WITH THE MINUTES OF THE PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT ENQUIRY COMMITTEE DATED 12/05/2025 VIDE ANNEXURE-F AND THEREBY SET ASIDE ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS THEREWITH, ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
ORAL ORDER
Heard Sri.Abhishek Malipatil, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Smt.Sukanya Baliga.B., learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the respondents.
¶2In this writ petition, the petitioner is assailing the order dated 12.05.2023 passed by Respondent No.2 (Annexure-F), wherein, penal action has been initiated against the petitioners herein, on account of alleging malpractice in the examination conducted in March-2022, Part I, D-Pharmacy annual examination.
¶3Noted the finding recorded by the Minutes of the 'Professional Misconduct Enquiry Committee' at Annexure-F dated 12.05.2023, after issuance of notice to the petitioners herein, the reply has been made by them. However, the same was rejected by the respondent-authorities. On careful consideration of the finding recorded by the minutes of the meeting dated 12.05.2023, it is forthcoming that, the empty answer scripts were stored by the petitioners, being the Chief Superintendent and the same has been utilized by the two institutions, which are situated adjacent and therefore, I am of the view that the said allegation made against the petitioners cannot be considered as essentiality or basis to the
malpractice being alleged in the said examination. In that view of the matter, the action taken against the petitioners herein, pursuant to the minutes of the meeting dated
12.05.2023 is erroneous and the same cannot be accepted. It is also to be noted that the respondent-authorities have given a notice produced at Annexures-R1 and R2, wherein, the same is not connected with the allegations made against the petitioners herein as to the error committed therein with regard to the sending the empty answer scripts to the two of its institutions, if so. It is also forthcoming from Annexure-B, wherein, multiple colleges have been conducting the examination as per the Notification dated 22.12.2022. In that view of the matter, I am of the opinion that the allegation made against the petitioners herein cannot be considered as a malpractice alleging such harsh action imposed against the petitioners by the respondents. Accordingly, I pass the following:
ORDER
i) The Writ Petition is allowed.
ii) The impugned order dated 12.05.2023, recording the minutes of the meeting passed by Respondent No. 2 against the petitioners at Annexure-F is accordingly set aside.
Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
DH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 47
Source: High Court of Karnataka, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.