VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Karnataka High Court 2026 › High Court of Karnataka

Smt Shobha v. Sri Venkatesh

DISPOSED
Court
High Court of Karnataka
Decided
16 March 2026
Bench
Anu Sivaraman, Tara Vitasta Ganju
Case no.
RFA 1701/2025

Follow Karnataka High CourtFollow Anu SivaramanFollow Tara Vitasta Ganju

Judgment

NC:(2026:KHC:15505-DB( RFA(No.(1701(of(2025( ( , ,,HC-KAR( ( ( IN(THE(HIGH(COURT(OF(KARNATAKA(AT(BENGALURU( THDATED(THIS(THE(16 (DAY(OF(MARCH,(2026( PRESENT( THE(HON'BLE(MRS.(JUSTICE(ANU(SIVARAMAN( AND(( THE(HON'BLE(MS.(JUSTICE(TARA(VITASTA(GANJU( REGULAR(FIRST(APPEAL(NO.(1701(OF(2025((SP)( ( BETWEEN:(( (

1., SMT.,SHOBHA,

W/O,H.C.,LINGARAJU,,,

AGED,ABOUT,46,YEARS,,,

R/A,HOSURU,VILLAGE,,,

BIDADI,HOBLI,,RAMANAGARA,TALUK,,,

RAMANAGARA,DISTRICT-562,109., ,

2., SRI.,H.,C.,LINGARAJU, S/O,LATE,CHIKKALINGAIAH,,, Digitally AGED,ABOUT,54,YEARS,, signedtiby RAKSHA R/AT,HOSURU,VILLAGE,, Location: BIDADI,HOBLI,,High0Court of0Karnataka RAMANAGARA,TALUK,, RAMANAGARA,DISTRICT-562,109., …APPELLANTS, (BY,SRI.,NIKHIL,HEGDE,,ADVOCATE), , NC:(2026:KHC:15505-DB( RFA(No.(1701(of(2025( ( , ,,HC-KAR( ( ( AND:( ( SRI,VENKATESH, S/O,VENKATAPPA,,, AGED,ABOUT,51,YEARS,,, R/AT,NO.50,,KENCHANAPALYA,VILLAGE,,, K.,GOLLAHALLI,POST,,, KENGERI,HOBLI,,, BENGALURU-560,074., …RESPONDENT, (BY,SRI.,DEEKSHITH,C.,,ADVOCATE), , , THIS, RFA, IS, FILED, UNDER, SEC.96, OF, CPC.,, AGAINST, THE, JUDGMENT, AND, DECREE, DATED, 17.11.2023, PASSED, IN, OS,NO.141/2017,ON,THE,FILE,OF,PRL.,SENIOR,CIVIL,JUDGE, AND,CJM,,RAMANAGARA.,,DECREEING,THE,SUIT,FOR,SPECIFIC, PERFORMANCE,OF,CONTRACT., , , THIS, APPEAL,, COMING, ON, FOR, ORDERS,, THIS, DAY,, JUDGMENT,WAS,DELIVERED,THEREIN,AS,UNDER:, , CORAM:, ,HON'BLE,MRS.,JUSTICE,ANU,SIVARAMAN, ,and,, ,HON'BLE,MS.,JUSTICE,TARA,VITASTA,GANJU, ,

ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN)

This appeal is preferred against the judgment and decree dated 17.11.2023 passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge and CJM, at Ramanagara in O.S.No.141/2017, by which the suit for specific performance was decreed, directing defendants No.1 and 2 to execute the Sale Deed after receiving the balance consideration of Rs.2,00,000/-.

¶2We have heard Shri. Nikhil Hegde, learned counsel appearing for the appellants and Shri. Deekshith C, learned counsel appearing for the respondent.

¶3It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for appellants that an amount of Rs.20,00,000/- has been deposited before this Court pursuant to an order dated 27.11.2025 in this appeal. Further, it is submitted that the respondent has also deposited an amount of Rs.2,00,000/- before Executing Court.

¶4It is submitted that parties have compromised the dispute and it has been agreed that the amount of Rs.20,00,000/- deposited by the appellants before this Court can be released in favour of the respondent. Further, it is also stated that the respondent herein had deposited an amount of Rs.2,00,000/- before the Executing Court which can also be duly refunded to the respondent with interest, if any earned. Further, the original Gift Deed dated 17.01.2013 and the Agreement of Sale dated 02.07.2016 shall be released to the appellants.

¶5The appellants as well as the respondent are present before the Court and are identified by their respective counsel. The settlement arrived at between the parties is recorded in the compromise petition. The terms of settlement read as follows:- "1. As per the terms of compromise, the Appellants have agreed to pay a total sum of Rs.20,00,000/- (Rupees Twenty Lakhs only) to the Respondent towards full and final settlement of all claims arising out of the suit agreement, decree and appeal proceedings.

¶2The said amount of Rs.20,00,000/- has already been deposited before this Hon'ble Court through DD Dated:

21.01.2026 bearing DD No.000080 in compliance with the interim order dated:27.11.2025 and the Respondent is permitted to withdraw the same without furnishing any security.

¶3It is agreed that upon the receipt of the agreed compromise amount of Rs.20,00,000/- (Rupees Twenty Lakhs only), agreement of sale dated

02.07.2016, registered as Document No.2796/2016-17 executed between the parties in respect of the suit schedule property shall stand cancelled and terminated.

¶4Upon receipt of said amount, Respondent/Plaintiff agrees to give up the claim for specific performance of contract and agrees that the suit schedule property shall remain with Appellants/Defendant.

¶5The Respondent/Plaintiff further declares that all rights, title, Interest, possession and ownership in respect of the suit schedule property shall stand restored to the original owner/Appellant free from all encumbrances, claims, agreements, charges, liens, attachments or third-party interests created, if any, by the Respondent/Plaintiff. The Respondent/Plaintiff

shall not claim any right, title, interest or possession over the suit schedule property.

¶6The Respondent/Plaintiff agrees to execute any necessary documents, receipts, declarations or acknowledgments required to give effect to this compromise and to restore title of Appellants/Defendants.

¶7The Respondent/Plaintiff has deposited a sum of Rs.2,00,000/-(Rupees two lakhs only) before the executing court in Ex.No.48/2024 arising out of O.S No. 141/2017 towards execution. Now that the parties have amicably settled the dispute the parties respectfully pray that this Hon'ble court may be pleased to direct the Executing Court to release and refund the said sum of Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs only) in favour of Decree Holder/Respondent.

¶8Both parties agree that they have no further claims against each other in respect of the suit transaction, decree or appeal, and the compromise may be recorded in full satisfaction.

¶9The parties pray that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to dispose of the appeal in terms of this compromise and set aside the judgment and decree of the Trial Court accordingly."

¶6In view of the compromise as arrived at between the parties, the appeal is disposed of in terms of the compromise petition. The office of the Trial Court shall refund the amount of Rs.2,00,000/- deposited by the respondent herein to respondent on proper identification along with interest, if any, earned by the said amount.

¶7The Registry shall draw up decree in terms of the compromise. The Registry shall refund the eligible Court fee to the appellants on proper identification. All pending interlocutory applications shall stand disposed of.

Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE

Sd/- (TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE

RAK List No.: 3 Sl No.: 10

Source: High Court of Karnataka, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.