- Court
- High Court of Karnataka
- Decided
- 21 April 2026
- Bench
- S Sunil Dutt Yadav
- Case no.
- WP 12007/2026
Follow Karnataka High CourtFollow S Sunil Dutt Yadav
Judgment
e -e1e-eeeee e e NC:(2026:KHC:21477 WP(No.(12007(of(2026 IN(THE(HIGH(COURT(OF(KARNATAKA(AT(BENGALURU( STDATED(THIS(THE(21 (DAY(OF(APRIL,(2026( BEFORE( THE(HON'BLE(MR.(JUSTICE(S(SUNIL(DUTT(YADAV( WRIT(PETITION(NO.(12007(OF(2026((LA-KIADB) BETWEEN:(
1., SRI,GIRIGOWDA, S/O,LATE,SALAGIRIGOWDA,, AGED,ABOUT,58,YEARS,,, R/AT,CHEELUR,VILLAGE,,, MARALWADI,HOBLI,,HAROHALLI,TALUK,, BANGALORE,SOUTH,-,562,121, …,PETITIONER, (BY,SRI.,SURESH,K.,,ADVOCATE), AND: Digitally 1., PRINCIPAL,SECRETARY, signedtiby VIJAYA0P REVENUE,DEPARTMENT, Location: GOVERNMENT,OF,KARNATAKA, HIGH COURT0OF BENGALURU,-,560,001, KARNATAKA
2., THE,DEPUTY,COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE,SOUTH,DISTRICT,, BANGALORE,RAMANAGARA,ROAD, RAMANAGARA,TOWN, PIN,CODE,-,562,159,
3., ASSISTANT,COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE,SOUTH,DISTRICT, BANGALORE,RAMANAGARA,ROAD, e -e2e-eeeee e e NC:(2026:KHC:21477 WP(No.(12007(of(2026 RAMANAGARA,TOWN, PIN,CODE,-,562,159,
4., TAHSILDAR, HAROHALLI,TALUK,,KANAKAPURA,ROAD,, BANGALORE,SOUTH,DISTRICT, PINCODE,-,562,112,
5., THE,KARNATAKA,INDUSTRIAL,AREA, DEVELOPMENT,BOARD,, EAST,WING,,KHANIJA,BHAVAN,, BANGALORE-560,001,, REPRESENTED,BY,ITS,, CHIEF,EXECUTIVE,OFFICER,AND,, EXECUTIVE,MEMBER.,
6., THE,SPECIAL,LAND,ACQUISITION,OFFICER-1,, THE,KARNATAKA,INDUSTRIAL,AREA,, DEVELOPMENT,BOARD,, NO.,14/1,,ARAVINDA,BHAVAN,, ST1 ,FLOOR,,NRUPATHUNGA,ROAD,,, BENGALURU-560,001, …,RESPONDENTS, (BY,SRI.,HARISH,A.S.,,AGA,FOR,R1,TO,R4;, ,,,,,,SRI,H.L.,PRADEEP,KUMAR,,ADVOCATE,R5,AND,R6), , THIS,W.P.,IS,FILED,UNDER,ARTICLES,226,AND,227,OF, THE,CONSTITUTION,OF,INDIA,,PRAYING,TO,I),ISSUE,A,WRIT, IN, THE, NATURE, OF, CERTIORARI, QUASHING, THE, GENERAL, AWARD, BEARING, NO.KIADB-LAQ-722-2019-20, DATED, 11/10/2019, VIDE, ANNEXURE-A, PASSED, BY, THE, SIXTH, RESPONDENT,AND,ETC., , THIS,PETITION,COMING,ON,FOR,PRELIMINARY,HEARING,, THIS,DAY,,ORDER,WAS,MADE,THEREIN,AS,UNDER:, CORAM:, HON'BLE,MR.,JUSTICE,S,SUNIL,DUTT,YADAV
ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondents 1 to 4. Sri. H. L. Pradeep Kumar, learned counsel accepts notice for respondents 5 and 6.
¶2Petitioner has sought for issuance of writ of certiorari to set aside the general award at Annexure-A dated 11.10.2019 passed by respondent No.6. Petitioner has also sought for issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus to direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner in terms of Section 29(2) of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 (for short 'KIAD Act') and to pass consent award insofar as it relates to the land of the petitioner to the extent of 7 acres 4 guntas in Sy. No. 105/8, Cheeluru Village, Maralawadi Hobli, Harohalli Taluk, Ramanagara District (Bengaluru South District).
¶3The case of the petitioner is that he was willing for a consent award and accordingly, the question of passing of general award does not arise.
¶4Learned counsel for the respondent - Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board (KIADB) submits that the petition itself could be disposed of while setting aside the general award insofar as the petitioner is concerned and the respondent - Special Land Acquisition Officer, KIADB would consider the request of the petitioner and pass a consent award as per law.
¶5In light of the said stand and taking note of the directions passed in W.P.No.15026/2021, the petition is disposed of as follows:
(i) The impugned general award at Annexure-A insofar as the petitioner's land is concerned, is set aside.
(ii) Respondent No.6 is directed to consider the claim of the petitioner for passing of consent award
and pass a consent award in terms of Section 29(2) of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
(iii) It is made clear that, in the event if there is any dispute with regard to entitlement and apportionment of the award amount, the general award at Annexure-A would stand revived.
(iv) Liberty is reserved to the Special Land Acquisition Officer, KIADB to withdraw the amount, if deposited before the Civil Court pursuant to the general award. In terms of the above, the petition is disposed of. SD/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE VP
Source: High Court of Karnataka, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.