Sri. N. Venkatesh, v. The Chief Commissioner,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 2577 OF 2026 (S-RES)

BETWEEN:

SRI. N. VENKATESH S/O. LATE C. NARASIMHA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS NO.190, 2ND CROSS, MARIYAPPANAPALYA RAJAJINAGARA, SRIRAMAPURAM BENGALURU-560 021. …PETITIONER (BY SRI MANJUNATHA B.V ADVOCATE)

AND:

THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER, GREATER BENGALURU AUTHORITY N.R. SQUARE BENGALURU-560002. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. B.L. SANJEEV, ADVOCATE)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO REGULARIZE THE SERVICE OF THE PETITIONER FROM THAT DAY ON WHICH THE PETITIONER COMPLETED 10 YEARS OF SERVICE AND ETC.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR

Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

ORAL ORDER

In this petition, the petitioner has sought for the following reliefs: a) issue a writ in nature of Mandamus directing the Respondents to regularize the service of the petitioner from that day on which the petitioner completed 10 years of service.

b) Petitioner is entitled to fixation of their salaries as such regularization as obtaining to a permanent employee from that date they complete 10 years of service, and he is entitle for arrears of salary, and also the period of service shall be treated for all consequential benefits, that would follow from such regularization.

c) The Service rendered by the petitioner through and shall be counted for the purpose of determination of pension and all other incidental terminal benefits.

d) issue any other writ, order of directions on this Hon'ble Court may deem fit to grant in this circumstances of the case, including the cost of this petition.

e) Grant such other relief or directions as this Hon'ble court deems fit the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity.

¶2Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent and perused the material on record.

¶3It is the grievance of the petitioner that his representation dated 31.12.2025 at Annexure-B submitted to the respondent has not been considered so far by them nor any order has been passed on the same. Under these circumstances, the petitioner is before this Court by way of the present petition.

¶4Per contra, learned counsel for the respondent submits that if reasonable time is given, they would consider and pass necessary order on the said representation.

¶5In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances and rival submissions, the respondent is hereby directed to address the grievances of the petitioner and consider his representation dated 31.12.2025 at Annexure-B and pass appropriate order / take appropriate decision in

accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶6With the aforesaid directions, the petition stands disposed of.

Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE

DKB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 27