VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Karnataka High Court 2026 › High Court of Karnataka

Sri Venkataramana R S Alias Venkataravana R S v. Sri Bayyareddy V

Partly Allowed
Court
High Court of Karnataka
Decided
24 August 2026
Bench
Shivashankar Amarannavarauthor
Case no.
MFA 1102/2025

Follow Karnataka High CourtFollow Shivashankar Amarannavar

Judgment

((((((((((((HC-KAR, NC:(2026:KHC:45546( MFA(No.(1102(of(2025( ( ,,,,,,,,,, , CNR:(KAHC010095032025( ( ( IN(THE(HIGH(COURT(OF(KARNATAKA(AT(BENGALURU(

TH DATED(THIS(THE(24 (DAY(OF(AUGUST,(2026(

BEFORE(

THE(HON'BLE(MR.(JUSTICE(SHIVASHANKAR(AMARANNAVAR(

MISCELLANEOUS(FIRST(APPEAL(NO.(1102(OF(2025((MV-I)( ( BETWEEN:((

( , SRI.,VENKATARAMANA,R.S., ALIAS,VENKATARAVANA,R.S.,

S/O,LATE,SEENAPPA,,, NOW,AGED,ABOUT,31,YEARS,,, RESIDING,AT,REDDEMPALLI,VILLAGE,,

KASHETTIPALLI,POST,,SRINIVASAPUR,TLAUK,,, KOLAR,DISTRICT., …APPELLANT, (BY,SMT.,SUSHMITHA,G.,,ADVOCATE), AND:( (

1., SRI.,BAYYAREDDY,V., S/O,LATE,VENKATARAMANAPPA,,, Digitallytisignedtiby MAJOR,IN,AGE,,,LAKSHMINARAYANA MURTHY0RAJASHRI RESIDING,AT,DEEVIREDDYPALLI,VILLAGE,, Location:0HIGH LAKSHMIPURA,POST,,SRINIVASAPUR,TALUK,,,COURT0OF KARNATAKA KOLAR,DISTRICT,-,563,135., ,

2., UNITED,INDIA,INSURANCE,COMPANY,LIMITED, REGIONAL,OFFICE,,5TH,FLOOR,,, KRISHI,BHAVANA,,NRUPATHUNGA,ROAD,,, HUDSON,CIRCLE,,BENGALURU,-,560,001., REP.,BY,ITS,MANAGER., …RESPONDENTS, (BY,SRI.,B.C.,SEETHARAMA,RAO,,ADVOCATE,FOR,R2;, ,,,,,,VIDE,ORDER,DATED,12.11.2025,,NOTICE,TO,R1,IS,, ,,,,,,DISPENSED,WITH),

THIS MFA IS FILED U/S.173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 16.02.2023 PASSED IN MVC NO.7911/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE XII ADDITIONAL JUDGE AND ACMM, SMALL CAUSES COURT AND MACT, BENGALULRU, (SCCH-8), PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR

ORAL JUDGMENT This appeal is filed by the claimant seeking enhancement of compensation awarded in the Judgment and Award dated

16.02.2023 passed in MVC No.7911/2019 by XII Additional Judge and ACMM, Court of Small Causes and MACT, Bengaluru (SCCH-8).

¶2The appellant/claimant made a claim petition seeking for award of compensation for the injury sustained by him in a road traffic accident occurred on 20.06.2019 contending that the accident occurred due to rash and

negligent driving by the driver of Tractor bearing registration No.KA-07-TA-1019.

¶3The Tribunal recorded the evidence adduced by the parties and upon appreciating the evidence on record, assessed compensation and awarded compensation under various heads as under: Sl. No. Particulars

Amount

¶1loss of future income Rs. 1,99,920/-

¶2pain and sufferings Rs. 40,000/-

¶3Medical expenses Rs. 1,57,534/-

¶4Loss of amenities Rs. 40,000/-

¶5Loss during laid down period Rs. 70,000/-

¶6Food, nourishment and travel expenses Rs. 15,000/-

¶7Future medical expenses 40,000/-

Total Rs. 5,62,454/-

¶4The Tribunal has also awarded the interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of petition till realisation and directed respondent No.2/insurer to pay the compensation awarded with interest. The claimant has filed present appeal seeking enhancement of compensation.

¶5Heard the learned counsel for appellant and learned counsel for respondent No.2/insurer.

¶6Learned counsel for appellant would contend that, the claimant has sustained fracture of both bones of right leg and P.W.2 - Doctor who has treated the claimant has examined him and assessed his disability at

46.6% to the right lower limb and 15.5% disability to the whole body. But the Tribunal has erred in taking the disability of the claimant only at 7% to the whole body. Therefore, she prayed for taking the disability on higher side considering the evidence of Doctor. She further submits that, the compensation awarded under other heads is just and proper. With these, she prayed to allow the appeal.

¶7Learned counsel for respondent No.2/insurer would contend that, the Doctor who assessed the disability had seen the X-ray before examining the claimant and the fractures are united and considering the same, the

Tribunal has rightly taken the disability at 7%. He further submits that, the interest at 9% is on higher side. With these, he prayed for dismissal of the appeal.

¶8Having heard learned counsel for appellant/claimant and learned counsel for respondent No.2/insurer, the Court has perused the impugned Judgment, Award and Trial Court records.

¶9The claimant has sustained Type III B compound fracture both bones right leg and fracture leteral condyle right femur. P.W.2 - Doctor who has treated the claimant has examined and assessed his disability at 46.6% to the right lower limb and 15.5% disability to the whole body. P.W.2 - Doctor has admitted in his cross-examination, the fractures are united as per Ex.P85. The Doctor has also admitted that he had seen the x-ray taken prior to Ex.P85 at the time of assessment of disability.

¶10Considering the said evidence of Doctor and that the avocation of the claimant as Driver, the functional disability is to be taken at 10% as against 7% taken by the Tribunal. The Tribunal has rightly applied multiplier '17' since the age of the claimant is twenty six (26) years. In view of the same, loss of future income due to disability is calculated as under:

Rs.14,000/-X 12 X 17 X 10% = Rs.2,85,600/-

¶11The compensation awarded under other heads is just and proper.

¶12Considering all the above aspects, the claimant is entitled to loss of future income in a sum of Rs.2,85,600/- as against Rs.1,99,920/- awarded by the Tribunal with interest.

¶13Consequently, claimant is entitled to enhanced compensation of Rs.85,680/- (Rs.2,85,600/- - Rs.1,99,920/-) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of petition till realisation.

¶14Respondent No.2/insurer is liable to pay the said enhanced compensation amount with interest.

¶15The appellant/claimant is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 618 days in filing the appeal as per order dated 12.11.2025 passed on I.A.No.1/2025.

¶16In view of the above, the following:

ORDER

i) Miscellaneous First Appeal is allowed-in-part.

ii) The appellant/claimant is entitled to enhanced compensation of Rs.85,680/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of petition till realisation.

iii) Respondent No.2/insurer shall deposit the enhanced compensation amount with interest before the Tribunal within a period of six weeks from this day.

iv) The appellant/claimant is entitled to release of entire enhanced compensation with interest.

v) The appellant/claimant is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 618 days in filing the appeal.

Sd/- (SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE

KLV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 13

Source: High Court of Karnataka, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.