- Court
- High Court of Karnataka
- Decided
- 28 August 2026
- Bench
- Shivashankar Amarannavar
- Case no.
- MFA 1110/2025
Follow Karnataka High CourtFollow Shivashankar Amarannavar
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 1110 OF 2025 (MV-D) BETWEEN:
1. SMT. AKTHAR BANU W/O. NAZEER AHMED, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS
¶2SRI. NAZEER AHMED S/O LATE ABDUL BAYER AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS BOTH ARE R/AT NO. 18/1, HESARAGHATTA MAIN ROAD, BEHIND RAILWAY TRACK, BROTHERS COLONY, CHIKKABANAVARA, BENGALURU - 560 090. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. KAILAS SHANKAR P.S, ADVOCATE) AND:
¶1THE UNITED INDIA INS.CO.LTD., 5TH FLOOR, KRUSHI BHAVAN, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001, BY ITS REGIONAL MANAGER.
¶2MR. NABEEL MUSTHAFA, S/O. MUSTHAFA M., MAJOR,
Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
R/AT NASEEMA MAHAL, POYANAD P.O., MAMBARAM VIA PINARAY, THALASSERY, KANNUR DIST., KERALA - 670 741 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VRUSHABHENDRIAH H.C, ADVOCATE FOR R1; VIDE ORDER DATED 28.08.2026, NOTICE TO R2 DISPENSED WITH)
THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 25.11.2023 PASSED IN MVC NO.4020/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE XX ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES JUDGE AND A.C.M.M, MACT, BENGALURU (SCCH-22), PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
ORAL JUDGMENT
This appeal is filed by the claimants seeking enhancement of compensation awarded in the judgment and award dated
25.11.2023 passed in MVC No.4020/2021 by XX Additional Small Causes Judge and Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate and MACT, Bengaluru (SCCH-22).
¶2Even though the appeal is listed today for orders, it is taken up for disposal with the consent of learned counsel for appellants and learned counsel for respondent No.1/Insurer.
¶3The appellants/claimants made a claim petition praying to award compensation for the death of Master Suhail Pasha @ Siddiq in a road traffic accident occurred on 03.08.2021 contending that the accident occurred due to rash and negligent driving of the rider of a Bullet bearing registration No.KL-58-W-9995. The claimants are the parents of the deceased.
¶4The Tribunal after recording evidence and appreciating the evidence on record, has assessed the compensation and awarded compensation of Rs.5,50,000/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of petition till realisation and directed respondent Nos.1 and 2 to deposit the award amount with interest. The claimants seeking enhancement of the said compensation awarded by the tribunal have filed the present appeal.
¶5Heard the arguments of the learned counsel for the appellants and learned counsel for respondent No.1/ Insurer.
¶6Learned counsel for appellants would contend that the deceased is aged 12 years and is the son of the claimants and as per the decision of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Gayatree Pattnaik -vs-Arundhati Sahoo and another, 2026 INSC 785, loss of dependency is to be awarded by taking notional income. He further submitted that the claimants being parents are also entitled to parental consortium, funeral expenses and loss of estate. With this he prayed for allowing the appeal.
¶7Learned counsel for respondent No.1/Insurer would contend that the compensation awarded by the tribunal is just and proper and there are no grounds for enhancement.
¶8Having heard the learned counsels, the Court has perused the judgement and award.
¶9The accident occurred on 03.08.2021 and as on the date of accident the deceased was aged 12 years, the claimants are parents of the deceased as per the decision of Gayatree
Pattnaik supra the loss of dependency has to be awarded by taking notional income applying multiplier, deducting 50% towards personal expenses and adding 40% towards future prospects. The notional income for the year 2021 is Rs.15,000/-. The deceased is aged 12 years (below 15) the multiplier applicable is '15' as per the decision of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Reshma Kumari and others -vs-Madan Mohan and another 2013 Volume 9 SCC Page 65.
¶10In view of the above, loss of dependency is calculated as under.
Rs.15,000x(40%)=6000+15,000=21,000-1/2 =10,500x12x15=18,90,000/-.
¶11The claimants being the parents of the deceased, they are entitled to parental consortium in a sum of Rs.40,000/-with 10% escalation that is Rs.44,000x2=88,000/-
¶12The claimants are also entitled for funeral expenses of Rs.16,500/- and loss of estate of Rs.16,500/-.
¶13In view of the above, the claimants are entitled to total compensation under various heads as under:- Sl. No. Heads Amount Loss of dependency 18,90,000.00 Loss of consortium 88,000.00 Funeral expenses 16,500.00 Loss of estate 16,500.00
Total 20,11,000.00
¶14In which claimants are entitled to total compensation of Rs.20,11,000/- as against Rs.5,50,000/- awarded by the tribunal with interest. Consequently, the claimants are entitled to enhanced compensation of Rs.14,61,000/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of petition till realisation.
¶15Respondent No.1/Insurer is liable to pay the said enhanced compensation with interest.
¶16In view of the above, the following:-
ORDER i. The appeal is allowed in part. ii. The appellants/claimants are entitled to enhanced compensation of Rs.14,61,000/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of petition till realisation. iii. The claimants are not entitled to interest for the delay period of 429 days in filing the appeal as per order dated 28.08.2026 passed on I.A No.1/2025. iv. Respondent No.1/Insurer shall deposit the enhanced compensation with interest before the tribunal within a period of six weeks from this day. v. The claimants are entitled to release of the entire enhanced compensation amount in equal share.
Sd/- (SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE
VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1
Source: High Court of Karnataka, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.