- Court
- High Court of Karnataka
- Decided
- 23 September 2026
- Bench
- S.R.Krishna Kumar
- Case no.
- RP 532/2022
Follow Karnataka High CourtFollow S.R.Krishna Kumar
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR REVIEW PETITION NO.532 OF 2022 BETWEEN:
MR SHWETHADRI NAYAKA S/O NARAYANASWAMY NAYAKA AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS NO.379/1, NEETHI MARGA SIDDARTHANAGAR MYSORE-570 011. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. P.G.YATNAL, ADVOCATE) AND:
¶1THE MANAGER,
M/S NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD REGIONAL OFFICE SITUATED AT SUBHARAM COMPLEX NO.144, M G ROAD BANGALORE-560 001.
¶2MR NARASIMHAMURTHY M S/O MUNIRAJU AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS VRUSHABHAVATHIPURA ITTAMADU POST, BIDADI HOBLI RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562 109. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. GEETHA RAJ, ADVOCATE FOR R-1; R-2 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 R/W SECTION 114 OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 06/01/2021 IN MFA NO.6420/2018 (MV) C/W MFA CROB.NO.136/2018 (MV) AND ALLOW THIS REVIEW PETITION BY RESTORING THE MATTERS NO.6420/2018
(MV) C/W CROB.NO.136/2018(MV) TO ITS ORIGINAL FILE.
Digitally signed by VANDANA S Location: High Court of Karnataka
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
In this petition, petitioner seeks the following reliefs:
"(a) Review the judgment and order dated
06.01.2021 in MFA No.6420/2018 (MV) C/w MFA Crob. No.136/2018 (MV) and allow this review petition by restoring the matters No.6420/2018
(MV) C/w Crob.136/2018 (MV) to its original file.
(b) Pass such other order as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case including an order as to costs in the interest of justice."
¶2Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent No.1 and perused the material on record. Though notice of this petition is served on respondent No.2, he has chosen to remain unrepresented and has not contested the petition.
¶3A perusal of the material on record will indicate that the review petitioner was the owner of the offending vehicle, who was arrayed as respondent No.2 in MFA No.6420/2018 and respondent
No.1 in MFA Crob. No.136/2018 which were disposed of by this Court vide final judgment and award dated 06.01.2021. It is a matter of record and an undisputed fact that the review petitioner was served and unrepresented in the aforesaid appeal and it is contended that if one more opportunity is provided by setting aside the impugned judgment and award passed by this Court, the review petitioner would contest the said appeal and cross-objections on merits. Along with the review petition, the petitioner has also filed an application – I.A.1/2022 for production of additional documents.
¶4Though the review petition as well as the application – I.A.1/2022 is opposed by respondent No.1 – Insurance company, having regard to the undisputed fact that the review petitioner / owner of the offending vehicle had been served with notice of the appeal and had remained unrepresented and had not contested the appeal and the cross-objections coupled with the fact that the review petitioner has filed an application for permission to produce additional evidence, I am of the considered opinion that it would be just and appropriate to adopt a justice oriented approach and in
order to provide one more opportunity to the petitioner to contest the appeal on merits, I am of the view that the impugned judgment and award passed by this Court in MFA No.6420/2018 C/w MFA Crob. No.136/2018 deserves to be set aside and the appeal to be restored to the file of this Court for disposal on merits and in accordance with law.
¶5In the result, I pass the following: ORDER
(i) The review petition is hereby allowed.
(ii) The impugned judgment and award dated
06.01.2021 passed by this Court in MFA No.6420/2018 C/w MFA Crob. No.136/2018 is hereby set aside.
(iii) No.6420/2018 C/w Crob. No.136/2018 are restored to the file of this Court.
(iv) I.A.1/2022 is disposed of reserving liberty in favour of the review petitioner to file an appropriate application in No.6420/2018 C/w Crob. No.136/2018.
(v) Registry to list the matter before the appropriate bench having roster.
Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE
SV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21
Source: High Court of Karnataka, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.