Smt Sangeetha v. Sri Bharathreddy P N

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI CIVIL PETITION NO.212 OF 2026 BETWEEN:

SMT.SANGEETHA W/O BHARATHREDDY P N, D/O PADMAHNABHAREDDY, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, R/AT CHANNAGANAHALLI CHALLAKERE TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577 522.

…PETITIONER (BY SRI GURUDATH V.R., ADVOCATE FOR SRI SPOORTHY HEGDE N., ADVOCATE) AND:

SRI BHARATHREDDY P N S/O P NARAYANAREDDY, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/AT MEGALAPALYA VILLAGE Y N HOSAKOTE HOBLI, PAVAGADA TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT - 561 202.

…RESPONDENT (BY SRI CHANDRASHEKAR M S., ADVOCATE)

THIS CP IS FILED UNDER SEC.24 OF CPC., PRAYING TO TRANSFER MC NO.127/2025 BEFORE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MADHUGIRI, TO THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AT CHALLAKERE BY ALLOWING THIS PETITION IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.

by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI

ORAL ORDER

Seeking for transfer of proceedings in MC no.127/2025 on file of Principal Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Madhugiri to Principal Civil Judge and JMFC, Challakere, this petition is filed.

¶2Sri Gurudath V.R., learned counsel appearing for Sri Spoorthy Hegde N., advocate for petitioner and Sri Chandrashekar M.S., learned counsel for respondent jointly submitted that during pendency of petition, there was settlement between parties and terms are drawn out in a joint memo and prayed that petition may be disposed of in terms of joint memo.

¶3Terms of joint memo reads as under: "JOINT MEMO

¶1It is submitted that, the above petition was filed by the petitioner seeking transfer of the MC No.127/2025 before Principal Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Madhugiri filed by the respondent herein seeking Decree for Restitution of Conjugal Rights.

¶2It is submitted that, now the petitioner and the respondent have amicably settled the dispute

between them and agreed to settle the matter on following terms: a. The respondent has agreed to withdraw the MC No.127/2025 pending before Principal Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Madhugiri. b. The petitioner and respondent have agreed to file Mutual divorce petition at Madhugiri. c. The respondent has agreed to pay Rs.15,00,000/- to petitioner herein as permanent alimony while obtaining decree of divorce. d. The petitioner is retaining the Gold with is about 43 grams which are given to her by the respondent at the time of marriage which is included in the permanent alimony and the respondent has no claim over the same. e. Either parties have no right to claim the gold ornaments, silver ornaments and valuable things in future. f. The petitioner and the respondent has agreed that, there is no claim over any movable or immovable properties or claim of maintenance over each other except Rs.15,00,000/- and the gold as mentioned above towards the permanent alimony given by the respondent to petitioner herein. Wherefore, this Hon'ble Court may please to record the following terms of the joint memo and dispose-off the above petition with the liberty to the parties to file Mutual Divorce petition, in the interest of justice and equity."

¶4Parties are present and are identified by their respective counsel.

¶5On interaction, parties have stated that they have been explained terms and conditions of joint memo and after understanding same, they have affirmed it out of their free will and volition without there being any threat, coercion or undue influence from anybody.

¶6Joint memo is duly signed by both parties, whose signatures are identified by their respective counsel and settlement reported by them.

¶7I have perused terms of settlement in joint memo. Same are found to be lawful.

¶8Joint memo is taken on record and accepted.

¶9In terms of above, petition is disposed of as settled. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE

GRD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5