VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Mir Ziauddin v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
13 March 2026
Bench
S.M. Subramaniam, K. Surender
Case no.
WP 13467/2021

Follow Madras High CourtFollow S.M. SubramaniamFollow K. Surender

Judgment

ORDER (Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) The Writ of Mandamus has been instituted to direct the respondents 3 and 4 to restore the original road by removing the deviation and also to remove the illegal encroachment put up by the 5th Respondent, in front of the petitioner's land situated in Survey No.287, Injambakkam Village, Saidapet Division, now Sholinganallur Taluk. Page3 of 5

¶2Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the contesting respondents have encroached upon the public road. Complaints sent to the respondents, since not addressed, the present writ petition came to be instituted.

¶3The Tahsildar, Sholinganallur, filed a counter affidavit stating that the inspection and survey was conducted and encroachments in road are also identified.

¶4Learned counsel for the contesting respondents would submit that the respondents 6 to 9 have not encroached upon the public land.

¶5Be that as it may. The authorities, since conducted inspection and survey and identified the encroachments in public road, they are bound to initiate enforcement action by following the proceedings as contemplated under the relevant statues and rules in force. Opportunities are to be afforded to the encroachers and thereafter, the encroachers are to be evicted from the public road or government lands.

¶6Learned Additional Government Pleader would submit that the properties are falling under the jurisdiction of Chennai Corporation. The Page4 of 5 petitioner is at liberty to submit a copy of this order to the Commissioner, Chennai Corporation for initiation of appropriate action in co-ordination with the Tahsildar, Sholinganallur, for removing of encroachments. The contesting respondents are at liberty to defend their case by submitting an explanation or documents, if any. Such exercise is directed to be completed within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of . No costs.

(S.M.S.,J.) (K.S.,J.) 13-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order vsi To

¶1The District Collector Chennai District.

¶2The Thasildar

¶3The Village Administrative Officer Enjambakkam Village, Sholinganallur Taluk, Chennai.

¶4The Village Administrative Officer Sholinganallur Village, Sholinganallur Taluk, Chennai. WPoNo.o13467oofo2021 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,eJ. AND K.SURENDER,eJ. VSI WPeNo.e13467eofe2021 13-03-2026 Page5oofo5

Case details

Parties and counsel

2026:MHC:1075 Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K. SURENDER Mir Ziauddin S/o.Haji Syed Ibrahim, No.5/8, Dr. Thirumoorthy Nagar, 1st Street, Nungambakkam, Chennai- 600 034 ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector Chennai District. 2. The Thasildar 3. The Village Administrative Officer Enjambakkam Village, Sholinganallur Taluk, Chennai. 4. The Village Administrative Officer Sholinganallur Village, Sholinganallur Taluk, Chennai. 5. T.G.Gopinathan (Deceased), S/o.T.A.Govindan, Guruvilas, Old No.4/215, New No.4/212, M.G.R. Road, Palavakkam, Chennai- 600 041. 6. P.G.Sobha, W/o. Late Mr.T.G.Gopinath, Guruvillas, Old No.4/215, New No.4/212, M.G.R. Road, Palavakkam, Chennai - 600 041. 7. Mr.Nithin Gopinath, S/o. Late Mr.T.G.Gopinath, Guruvillas, Old No.4/215, New No.4/212, M.G.R. Road, Palavakkam, Chennai - 600 041. Page2 of 5 8. Mr.Naveen Gopinath, S/o. Late Mr.T.G.Gopinath, Guruvillas, Old No.4/215, New No.4/212, M.G.R. Road, Palavakkam, Chennai - 600 041. 9. Mr.Nirmal Gopinath, S/o. Late Mr.T.G.Gopinath, Guruvillas, Old No.4/215, New No.4/212, M.G.R. Road, Palavakkam, Chennai - 600 041. (R6 to R9 are substituted as Lrs of the deceased fifth respondent R5 vide order dted 23.01.2026 made in WMP.1993/2026 in WP.13467/2021 by SMSJ, CKJ) ..Respondent(s) Directing the 3rd and 4th respondents herein, to restore the original Road, by removing the deviation , and also to remove the illegal encroachment put up by the 5th Respondent, in front of the petitioner land situated in survey No.287, Injambakkam Village, Saidapet Division, now For Petitioner(s): Mr.B.Divakaran For Respondent(s): Mr.T.Arun kumar, AGP for R1 to R4 , R5 - Died , Mr.Sandeep Shah for Mr.Bhaghyamchari for R6

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.