- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 1 April 2026
- Bench
- S. M. Subramaniam, K. Surender
- Case no.
- WP 28903/2024
Judgment
Order (Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) Mr.R.Shanmugasundara, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner would submit that during the pendency of the present Writ Petition, the encroachments were removed. However, he raised an objection Page3 of 5 that no further encroachments should be allowed, since it is a dead end road and there should not be any obstructions for the petitioner as well as the residents to use the road in a free manner.
¶2It is needless to state that the Authorities are bound to ensure that the public roads are kept free from encroachments enabling the people to use the road in a peaceful manner.
¶3The learned counsel for the contesting respondents would submit that the petitioner also has encroached upon the land.
¶4In this regard the Corporation Authorities shall ensure that any encroachments identified in that locality is removed by following the procedures as contemplated under law. With these observations, this Writ Petition is closed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed. (S.M.S.,J.) (K.S.,J.) 01-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order DSA Page4 of 5 To
¶1The Principal Secretary to Government, Housing and Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009.
¶2The Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Egmore, Chennai-600 008.
¶3The Principal Secretary/ Commissioner Greater Chennai Corporation, Ripon Building, Chennai-600 003.
¶4The Zonal Executive Engineer, (Zone-X), No.64, NSK Salai, Kodambakkam, Chennai-600 024. WPoNo.o28903oofo2024 S.M.SUBRAMANIAMeJ. AND K.SURENDEReJ. DSA WPeNo.e28903eofe2024 e 01-04-2026 Page5oofo5
Case details
Parties and counsel
2026:MHC:1340 Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 01-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K. SURENDER and WMP Nos. 10289 and 31534 of 2024 I.Xavier Muthupapa ..Petitioner Vs 1. The Principal Secretary to Government, Housing and Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009. 2. The Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Egmore, Chennai-600 008. 3. The Principal Secretary/ Commissioner Greater Chennai Corporation, Ripon Building, Chennai-600 003. 4. The Zonal Executive Engineer, (Zone-X), No.64, NSK Salai, Kodambakkam, Chennai-600 024. 5. A.Moses 6. R.Sheela Bai 7. P.S.Ganesh 8. K.S.Prakash 9. Pandiyan Page2 of 5 10.M.B.Kumaran 11.N.Ramalingam ..Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3rd and 4th respondents to take appropriate action in pursuance to the proceedings of the 2nd respondent in Letter No. EC / C-1 / 11407 / 2021 dated 12.1.2024 and submit an action taken report to the 2nd respondent and for a consequential direction directing the respondents 2 to 4 to remove the encroachment made by the respondents 5 to 11 herein Plot No. 9 completely obstructing the 15 feet pathway in the approved layout so as to enable the petitioner to have access to his residential house in Plot No.10 Parthasarathy Street, Saligramam, Chennai 93. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Shanmugasundaram, Senior Counsel for Dr.R.Gouri For Respondents : Mr.T.Arunkumar, Addl. Govt. Pleader for R1 Mr.A.Arun Babu, Standing Counsel for R3 & R4 Mr.S.Vinod for R6 to R11 R2 and R5 – No appearance
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.