- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 2 April 2026
- Bench
- S. M. Subramaniam, K. Surender
- Case no.
- CONT P 2976/2025
Judgment
ORDER (Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) The present contempt petition has been instituted to punish the respondents for their willful disobedience of the interim order dated
24.06.2025 passed in WA.No.1860 of 2025.
¶2Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the interim order passed by this Court has not been complied with.
¶3Per-contra, learned Government Advocate would furnish the copy of another interim order passed by the Division Bench of this Court on
26.09.2025 in W.A.No. 2917 of 2025 and paragraph 3 of the order reads as under, "…
¶3Among the two, who is eligible to get such appointment as P.G.Assistant (Commerce) in the fourth respondent School can be decided at later point of time at the final hearing of the writ appeals, but in the meanwhile, in order to avoid hindrance for the students' studies at the School, we hereby direct Page3 of 5 the fourth respondent School Management to engage both the appellant as well as the fifth respondent as both are qualified to hold the post of P.G.Assistant (Commerce) to take classes for the students concerned in the Commerce Subject until further orders. It is made clear that, merely because these two teachers are drawn for taking classes as P.G.Assistant (Commerce) subject, that would not ipso facto confer any right on them to claim appointment and approval of such post in future as that would be decided only on the basis of the merits at the final hearing of both the writ appeals."
¶4Pertinently, both these writ appeals have been instituted by the contempt petitioner herein, namely Kavitha. As far as the subsequent order of the Division Bench dated 26.09.2025 is concerned, both writ appeals have been tagged, and the Court has directed to list the matters for consideration.
¶5In view of this, petitioner has to seek for further hearing. However, this Court does not find any willful disobedience of the order of the Court warranting initiation of action for contempt of Court.
¶6Registry is directed to list both the writ appeals viz., WA.No.1860 of 2025 and WA.No.2917 of 2025 before the Bench holding roster. Page4 of 5
¶7With the above observation, the contempt petition stands closed. No costs. (S.M.S.,J.) (K.S.,J.) 02-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order GD To
¶1A.R.Rajkumar S/o. A.M. Rahendran, B.T. Assisant (History), Hindu Higher Secondary School, Karumbu-635 811 Tirupattur District.
¶2S.Kannappan, The Director Of School Education DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai 6.
¶3R.Punniyakotti, The Chief Educational Officer, Tirupattur District, Tirupattur.
¶4Sathiyapraba The District Educational Officer (Secondary) Tirupattur Educational District, Tirupattur.
¶5K.B.Krishnan, The Secretary Hindu Higher Secondary School, Karumbur 635 811, Tirupattur District. CONToPoNo.o2976oofo2025 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,eJ. AND K.SURENDER,eJ. GD CONTePeNo.e2976eofe2025 02-04-2026 Page5oofo5
Case details
Parties and counsel
2026:MHC:1408 Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K. SURENDER L.Kavitha ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. A.R.Rajkumar S/o. A.M. Rahendran, B.T. Assisant (History), Hindu Higher Secondary School, Karumbu-635 811 Tirupattur District. 2. S.Kannappan, The Director Of School Education DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai 6. 3. R.Punniyakotti, The Chief Educational Officer, Tirupattur District, Tirupattur. 4. Sathiyapraba The District Educational Officer (Secondary) Tirupattur Educational District, Tirupattur. 5. K.B.Krishnan, The Secretary Hindu Higher Secondary School, Karumbur 635 811, Tirupattur District. ..Contemnor(s) Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondents for committing grave contempt and gross Page2 of 5 disobedience of the order passed by this Court in WA No.1860 of 2025 dated 24.06.2025. For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Ramachandran For Contemnor(s): Mr.K.H.Ravikumar Government Advocate for R2-4
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.