Mohammed Nishan v. The State of Tamilnadu Represented by Secretary to Government

ORDER (Order of the Court was made by Sunder Mohan J.) The brother of the detenu – Mohamed Shan S/o.Ali aged about 24 years, has filed this petition challenging the detention order dated 18.09.2025, branding him as 'Drug Offender' under Section 2(e) of the Tamil Nadu Preventive Detention Act, 1982 (Act 14/1982).

¶2We have heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side) for the respondents. Page3 of 6

¶3Though several grounds have been raised, we are of the view that the detention order is liable to be quashed on the ground that the satisfaction of the detaining authority as regards the real possibility of the detenu coming out on bail suffers from non-application of mind.

¶4The detaining authority has relied upon a statement said to have been made by the mother of the detenu, under Section 180(3) of the BNSS that she is taking steps to file a bail application in the ground case. However, we find that the statement of the mother of the detenu is unsigned. We have in HCP No. 1684 of 2025 vide order dated 01.04.2026, held that, the unsigned statement cannot be relied upon to infer that the detenu is likely to file bail application.

¶5Therefore, the reliance placed on the said statement by the detaining authority to arrive at the satisfaction that there is a real possibility of the detenu coming out on bail is misconceived. Thus, the inference that the detention is warranted since the detenu is likely to indulge in further criminal activities after his release on bail is based on the said wrong premise. Hence, the detention order is liable to be quashed.

¶6In light of the aforesaid discussion, this Habeas Corpus Petition is allowed and the Detention Order passed by the second respondent in No.702/BBCDEFGISSSV/2025 dated 18.09.2025 is set aside. Page4 of 6

¶7The detenu, viz., Mohamed Shan S/o.Ali aged about 24 years, who is now confined in Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai, is hereby directed to be set at liberty forthwith unless his presence is required in connection with any other case. (A.S.M.,J.) (S.M.,J.) 01-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order dk Note: Issue Today Page5 of 6 To

¶1The Secretary to Government, Prohibition and Excise Department, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009.

¶2The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai, Office of the Commissioner of Police, (Goondas Section), Vepery, Chennai 600 007.

¶3The Superintendant of Police Central Prison, Puzhal.

¶4The Inspector of Police PEW Annanagar Unit, Chennai.

5.The Joint Secretary, Law and Order Department, Secretariat, Chennai.

¶6The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. HCPoNo.602oofo2026 DR.ANITAoSUMANTH,oJ. AND SUNDERoMOHAN,oJ. dk HCPoNo.o602oofo2026 01-06-2026 Page6oofo6

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 01-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN HCP No. 602 of 2026 Mohammed Nishan S/o.Ali, Pulikkathodi House, Nenmini, Thachinganadam Post Office, Malappuram, Kerala - 679 325. ...Petitioner/Brother of detenu Vs 1. The State of Tamilnadu, Represented by Secretary to Government, Prohibition and Excise Department, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009. 2. The Commissioner of Police Greater Chennai, Office of the Commissioner of Police, (Goondas Section), Vepery, Chennai - 600 007. 3. The Superintendant of Police, Central Prison, Puzhal. 4. The Inspector of Police PEW Annanagar unit, Chennai. ...Respondents Page2 of 6 Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Habeas Corpus, to call for the records relating to the detention order dated 18.09.2025 passed by the second respondent in B.B.C.D.E.F.G.I.S.S.S.V.No.702/2025 and quash the same and direct the respondents herein to produce the petitioners brother Mohammed Shan, S/o.Ali, aged about 24 years, who is presently under going detention in the Central Prison, Puzhal, before this Court and set him at liberty. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Manojkumar For Respondents: Mr.C.R.Malarvannan Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side)