VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Najma Bibi v. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep by the Secretary to Government,

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
4 June 2026
Bench
Anita Sumanth, Sunder Mohan
Case no.
HCP 2272/2025

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Anita SumanthFollow Sunder Mohan

Judgment

ORDER (Order of the Court was made by Sunder Mohan J.) The sister of the detenu – F. Najbul Haque, aged 35 years, S/o. Faijul Haque, has filed this petition challenging the detention order dated 29.09.2025, branding him as a 'Drug Offender' under Section 2(e) of the Tamil Nadu Preventive Detention Act, 1982 (Act 14/1982).

¶2We have heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Crl.Side) for respondents.

¶3From the submissions and perusal of the records, it is seen that the booklet containing relevant documtents that has been relied upon by the detaining authority has not been furnished to the detenu in Bengali. Admittedly, the detenu is acquainted only with Bengali. In fact, the detention order and the Page3 of 5 grounds of detention were supplied to the detenu in Bengali which confirms that the detenu is only acquainted with Bengali. It is well settled that if the relied upon documents are not furnished in the language known to the detenu, his right to make effective representation would be denied. In 'Powanammal Vs. State of Tamil Nadu' reported in '(1999) 2 SCC 413', the Hon'ble Supreme Court had held that non-supply of relevant documents in the language known to the detenu renders the detenu's detention illegal.

4.Accordingly, this Habeas Corpus Petition is allowed and the Detention Order passed by the second respondent in Detention Order C.No.159/G/IS/2025 dated 29.09.2025 is set aside.

¶5The detenu, viz., F. Najbul Haque, aged 35 years, S/o. Faijul Haque, now confined in Central Prison, Coimbatore, is directed to be set at liberty forthwith, unless his presence is required in connection with any other case. (A.S.M.,J.) (S.M.,J.) 04-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Note : Issue Order Copy Today dk Page4 of 5 To

¶1The Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Fort St George, Chennai - 600 009.

¶2The Commissioner of Police/ Detaining Authority, Office of the Commissioner of Police, Coimbatore City.

¶3The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison, Coimbatore District.

¶4The Inspector of Police, C-1, Katoor Police Station, Coimbatore City.

5.The Joint Secretary, Law and Order Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.

¶6The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. HCPoNo.2272oofo2025 DR.ANITAoSUMANTH,oJ. AND SUNDERoMOHAN,oJ. dk HCPoNo.o2272oofo2025 04-06-2026 Page5oofo5

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 04-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Najma Bibi W/o. Asraf, Bilaspur, Alinagar, Kaliganj, Murshidabad, West Bengal. ...Petitioner/Sister of the Detenu Vs 1. The State of Tamil Nadu, rep by The Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Fort St George, Chennai - 600 009. 2. The Commissioner of Police/ Detaining Authority Office of the Commissioner of Police, Coimbatore City. 3. The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison, Coimbatore District. 4. The Inspector of Police C-1, Katoor Police Station, Coimbatore City. ..Respondent(s) Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Habeas Corpus, calling for the records relating to the Page2 of 5 Detention order vide C.No.159/G/IS/2025 dated 29.09.2025, passed by the second respondent and quash the same and direct the respondents herein to produce the petitioner's brother namely F. Najbul Haque, S/o. Faijul Haque, Aged 35 years, who is presently under going detention in the Central Prison, Coimbatore before this Court and set him at liberty. For Petitioner: Mr.M.N.Balakrishnan For Respondents: Mr.C.R.Malarvannan Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.