VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Meenakshi v. State Rep.By the Additional Chief Secretary to Government,

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
5 June 2026
Bench
Anita Sumanth, Sunder Mohan
Case no.
HCP 2515/2025

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Anita SumanthFollow Sunder Mohan

Judgment

ORDER (Order of the Court was made by Sunder Mohan J.) The mother of the detenu – Abinash S/o.Murali, aged 19 years, has filed this petition challenging the detention order dated 09.09.2025, branding him as 'Goonda' under Section 2(f) of the Tamil Nadu Preventive Detention Act, 1982 (Act 14/1982).

¶2We have heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side) for the respondents. Page3 of 6

¶3Though several grounds have been raised, we are of the view that the detention order is liable to be quashed on the ground that the satisfaction of the detaining authority as regards the real possibility of the detenu coming out on bail suffers from non-application of mind.

¶4The detaining authority has relied upon a statement said to have been made by the mother of the detenu, under Section 180(3) of the BNSS that she is taking steps to file a bail application in the ground case. However, we find that the statement of the mother of the detenu is unsigned. We have in HCP No. 1684 of 2025 vide order dated 01.04.2026, held that, the unsigned statement cannot be relied upon to infer that the detenu is likely to file bail application.

¶5Therefore, the reliance placed on the said statement by the detaining authority to arrive at the satisfaction that there is a real possibility of the detenu coming out on bail is misconceived. Thus, the inference that the detention is warranted since the detenu is likely to indulge in further criminal activities after his release on bail is based on the said erroneous premise. Hence, the detention order is liable to be quashed.

¶6In light of the aforesaid discussion, this Habeas Corpus Petition is allowed and the Detention Order passed by the second respondent in No. 658/BBCDEFGISSSV/2025 dated 09.09.2025 is set aside. Page4 of 6

¶7The detenu, viz., Abinash S/o.Murali, aged 19 years, who is now confined in Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai, is hereby directed to be set at liberty forthwith unless his presence is required in connection with any other case. (A.S.M.,J.) (S.M.,J.) 05-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Issue order copy today. dk Page5 of 6 To

¶1The Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Government of Tamilnadu, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009.

¶2The Commissioner of Police Greater Chennai.

¶3The Superintendent of Prison Central Prison-II, Puzhal, Chennai.

¶4The Inspector of Police (L & O), R-9,Valasaravakkam Police Station, Chennai.

¶5The Joint Secretary, Law and Order Department, Secretariat, Chennai.

¶6The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. HCPoNo.2515oofo2025 DR.ANITAoSUMANTH,oJ. AND SUNDERoMOHAN,oJ. dk HCPoNo.o2515oofo2025 05-06-2026 Page6oofo6

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 05-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Meenakshi W/o.Murali, No.4/4, Pallikooda Street, Karambakkam, Porur, Chennai 600 116. ...Petitioner/Mother of the detenu Vs 1. State Rep. By The Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Government of Tamil Nadu, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009. 2. The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai. 3. The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison - II, Puzhal, Chennai. 4. The Inspector of Police (L & O), R-9,Valasaravakkam Police Station, Chennai. ...Respondents Page2 of 6 Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Habeas Corpus, calling for the records pertaining to the order of Detention dated on 09.09.2025 passed by the 2nd respondent in No. 658/BBCDEFGISSSV/2025 and quash the same as illegal and direct the respondent to produce the detenu Thiru.Abinash S/o.Murali Male, aged about 19 years , now confined at Central Prison -II, Puzhal, Chennai before this Court and set him at liberty. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Senthil Kumar For Respondents: Mr.C.R.Malarvannan, Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.