VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

K.Pannerselvam, v. The State of Tamil Nadu,

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
2 July 2026
Bench
S.M. Subramaniam, N.Senthilkumar
Case no.
WA 1750/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow S.M. SubramaniamFollow N.Senthilkumar

Judgment

JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.M.Subramaniam J.) The governing principles for promotion are well settled. Promotion per se cannot be claimed as an absolute right by an employee. However, consideration for promotion is a right of an employee. All eligible persons waiting for promotion are to be considered whenever an administrative decision is taken to fill up the higher posts. At the time of preparation of the panel, the names of all the eligible persons are to be considered. The eligibility criteria as contemplated under the service rules applicable, are to be scrupulously followed.

¶2In the context of the above principles, in the present case, the writ petitioner/appellant working in the Forest Department have been implicated in a criminal case. The criminal case registered in Spl.C.C.No.04/2021 on the file of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Krishnagiri, is pending for trial. Under those circumstances, the appellant filed a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent to consider him for grant of promotion to the post of Forest Range Officer. Page3 of 4

¶3The relief as such sought for in the writ petition itself is not maintainable. No direction for grant of promotion be issued by the High Court unless such person is eligible and his name was passed over in contravention to the rules. In the present case, pending criminal case is a bar for grant of promotion. That being the factum, the writ Court has rightly rejected the writ petition and the same stands confirmed. Thus, Writ Appeal stands dismissed. No costs. (S.M.S.,J.) (N.S.,J.) 02-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order vsi To

¶1The Addl Chief Secreatary to Government, Environment, climate change and Forest Department,Fort.St.George, Chennai 600 009

¶2The Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, and Head of Forest Force, Forest Headquarters, Velachery Main Road, Guindy, Chennai -600 032.

¶3The Divisional Forest Officer, Social Forestry and Forest Extension Division, Krishnagiri. WAoNo.o1750oofo2026 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,eJ. AND N.SENTHILKUMAR,eJ. vsi WAeNo.e1750eofe2026 02-07-2026 Page4oofo4

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR 1. K.Pannerselvam, S/o.M.Kasindiran, Forester, Kottapatti Range, Hosur Division, Dharmapuri Circle. 2. A.Annadurai, S/o. Annamalai, Forester, Thenkanikottai Range, Hosur Wildlife Division, Dharmapuri Circle. ..Appellant(s) Vs 1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by its Addl Chief Secreatary to Government, Environment, climate change and Forest Department, Fort.St.George, Chennai 600 009 2. The Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, and Head of Forest Force, Forest Headquarters, Velachery Main Road, Guindy, Chennai -600 032. 3. The Divisional Forest Officer, Social Forestry and Forest Extension Division, Krishnagiri. ..Respondent(s) Page2 of 4 Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to set aside the order passed by W.P.No. 39077 of 2025 dt. 17.10.2025 For Appellant(s): Mr.M.Velmurugan For Respondent(s): Dr.R.Gouri, Government Counsel for R1 to R3

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.