VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Mahalakshmi v. The Secretary to the Government,

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
8 July 2026
Bench
Anita Sumanth, Sunder Mohan
Case no.
HCP 2566/2025

Judgment

ORDER (Order of the Court was made by Sunder Mohan J.) The mother of the detenu – Dineshkumar, aged 25 years, S/o.Muthusamy, has filed this petition challenging the detention order dated 13.11.2025, branding him as 'Goonda' under Section 2(f) of the Tamil Nadu Preventive Detention Act, 1982 (Act 14/1982). Page3 of 6

¶2Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu for the respondents.

¶3Though several grounds have been raised, we are of the view that the detention order is liable to be quashed on the ground that the satisfaction of the detaining authority as regards the real possibility of the detenu coming out on bail suffers from non-application of mind.

¶4It is seen from the grounds of detention that the detaining authority has stated that the detenu has not moved any bail application. However, he has also stated that there is real possibility of the detenu coming out on bail by filing appropriate bail application. Admittedly, there was no material placed before the detaining authority that the detenu or his relatives were taking steps to file a bail application. In such circumstances, inference of the detaining authority that the detenu is likely to file a bail application and come out on bail is his mere ipse dixit. Since the satisfaction arrived at by the detaining authority is without basis, the conclusion that the detenu would indulge in further criminal Page4 of 6 activities, is vitiated. For the aforesaid reason, the detention order is liable to be quashed.

¶5In light of the aforesaid discussion, this Habeas Corpus Petition is allowed and the Detention Order passed by the second respondent in C.M.P.No.93/Goonda/2025 (M1) dated 13.11.2025, is set aside.

¶6The detenu, viz., Dineshkumar, aged 25 years, S/o.Muthusamy, who is now confined in Central Prison, Salem, is hereby directed to be set at liberty forthwith unless his presence is required in connection with any other case. (A.S.M.,J.) (S.M.,J.) 08-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Note: Issue order copy today. dk Page5 of 6 To

¶1The Secretary to the Government, Home Prohibition and Excise Dept., Secretariat, Chennai-600 009.

¶2District Magistrate and District Collector of Namakkal District, Namakkal.

¶3The Superintendent of Police, Namakkal District, Namakkal.

¶4The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison, Salem.

¶5The Inspector of Police, Pallipalayam Police Station,

6.The Joint Secretary, Law and Order Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.

¶7The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. HCPoNo.o2566oofo2025 DR.ANITAoSUMANTH,oJ. AND SUNDERoMOHAN,oJ. dk HCPoNo.o2566oofo2025 08-07-2026 Page6oofo6

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Mahalakshmi W/o.Muthusamy, No.67/75, ER Theatre Road, Pallipalayam, Kumarapalayam Taluk, ...Petitioner/Mother of the Detenue Vs 1. The Secretary to the Government, Home Prohibition and Excise Dept., Secretariat, Chennai-600 009. 2. District Magistrate and District Collector of Namakkal District, Namakkal. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Namakkal District, Namakkal. 4. The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison, Salem. Page2 of 6 5. The Inspector of Police, Pallipalayam Police station, ...Respondents Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Habeas Corpus, calling for the records in connection with the order of Detention passed by the second respondent dated 13.11.2025 in C.M.P.No.93/Goonda/2025 (M1) against the petitioner Son Dineshkumar, male aged 25 years, S/o.Muthusamy, who is confined at Central Prison, Salem and set aside the same and direct the respondents to produce the detenue before the Court and set him at liberty. For Petitioner: M/s.D.Balaji For Respondents: Mr.C.R.Malarvannan Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.