- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 14 July 2026
- Bench
- Anita Sumanth, Sunder Mohan
- Case no.
- HCP 282/2026
Judgment
Order (Order of the Court was made by Dr.Anita Sumanth J.) One Elangovan (detenu) S/o. Thanikasalam, who was detained as a Goonda under Section 2(f) of the Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 (in short 'Act') has approached this Court challenging the order of detention dated 28.11.2025.
¶2We have heard Ms.J.K.Madhumathi, learned counsel for Mr.D.Balaji, learned counsel for petitioner and Mr.C.R.Malarvannan, learned Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side) for respondents.
¶3Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the detenu has not moved a bail application. Hence, the subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority that the detenu may be released on bail is mere ipse dixit. The authority goes on to note that there are fair chances of either the detenu or his relatives moving a bail application. However, as there is no credible statement that has been recorded from the relatives of the detenu, and no other material on record to support the inference, such an inference has no basis, and hence stands vitiated.
¶4That apart, a comparison of the order dated 22.04.2024 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Sriperumbudur, in Crl.M.P.No.3348 of 2024 with the present case is misplaced, as that accused had no previous case whereas the detenu has four adverse cases. Since the circumstances in the present matter are far graver, we find that the subjective satisfaction of the authority that the detenu may be enlarged on bail based on such a comparison, is misplaced.
¶5In light of the aforesaid discussion, this Habeas Corpus Petition is allowed and the Detention Order passed by the second respondent in B3/D.O.No.104/2025 dated 28.11.2025 is set aside.
¶6The detenu, viz., Elangovan, S/o. Thanikasalam, male aged 39 years, confined in Central Prison, Vellore, is directed to be set at liberty forthwith unless his presence is required in connection with any other case. (A.S.M.,J.) (S.M.,J.) 14-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking order SSM Note to Registry : Issue Today To
¶1The Secretary to the Government Home, Prohibition and Excise Dept., Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009.
¶2District Collector and District Magistrate of Ranipet District, Ranipet-1.
¶3The Superintendent of Police Ranipet District, Ranipet.
¶4The Superintendent of Prison Central Prison, Vellore.
¶5The Inspector of Police Arcot Town Police Station, Ranipet District.
¶6The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.
¶7The Joint Secretary to Government, Public (Law and Order), Secretariat, Fort.St.George, Chennai -9. DR.ANITA SUMANTH J. AND SUNDER MOHAN J. SSM 14-07-2026
Case details
Parties and counsel
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 14-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Elangovan S/o.Thanikasalam, No.1/28. Velalar Street, Muppathuvetti Village, Arcot Taluk and Ranipet District. (Now confined at Central Prison, Vellore) ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Secretary to the Government Home, Prohibition and Excise Dept., Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009. 2. District Collector and District Magistrate of Ranipet District, Ranipet-1. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Ranipet District, Ranipet. 4. The Superintendent of Prison Central Prison, Vellore. 5. The Inspector of Police Arcot Town Police Station, Ranipet District. ..Respondent(s) Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of habeas corpus to call for the records in connection with the order of detention passed by the 2nd respondent dt. 28.11.2025 in B3/D.O.No. 104/2025 petitioner/Detenu Elangovan, Male aged 39 years S/o. Thanikasalam, who is confined at Central Prison, Vellore and set aside the same and direct the respondents to produce the detenue before the Honble Court and set him at liberty. For Petitioner(s): Ms.J.K.Madhumathi For Mr.D.Balaji For Respondent(s): Mr.C.R.Malarvannan, Counsel For Government Of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side)
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.