- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 26 February 2026
- Bench
- Sunder Mohan
- Case no.
- CRL RC 388/2026
Judgment
ORDER The Criminal Revision challenges the dismissal of the petitioner's application filed under Section 503 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), seeking the return of his two wheeler – Yamaha FZ-S bearing Reg.No.TN-15-MD-5350, which was seized during the course of investigation in Crime No.601 of 2025 registered for the offences under Sections 4(1)(i) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act and 4(1)(A) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 2024.
¶2The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner had transported 17 bottles of IMFL liquor without a valid license in the two-wheeler and thus committed the aforesaid offences.
¶3During the course of the investigation, the petitioner's vehicle was seized. The petitioner sought for return of the vehicle before the Trial Court, which came to be dismissed by the impugned order.
¶4Mr.S.Kumaresan, the learned counsel for the petitioner, would submit that the petitioner is the owner of the vehicle and entitled to interim custody of the vehicle; that the vehicle has been lying idle from the date of seizure, namely
10.10.2025; and that the vehicle may be returned on any stringent conditions subject to the result of the confiscation proceedings. Page3 of 5
¶5Mr. R. Vinothraja, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent, per contra, submitted that confiscation proceedings have been initiated.
¶6Considering the fact that the vehicle is lying idle at the police station and since the petitioner is the owner of the vehicle, this Court is inclined to hand over interim custody of the vehicle to the petitioner subject to the result of the confiscation proceedings on the following conditions:
(i)The petitioner shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thirukoilur;
(ii) The petitioner shall produce the original RC Book along with a self-attested Photostat copy of the RC Book of the vehicle and other relevant records to prove his ownership. The learned Judicial Magistrate, Thirukoilur, shall peruse the RC book and other records, retain a xerox copy of the same, and return the original RC book to the petitioner;
(iii) The petitioner shall not alter or alienate the vehicle in any manner;
(iv) The petitioner shall also give an undertaking that he will produce the vehicle as and when required by the respondent and by the Court below;
(v) The return of property would be subject to the result of the confiscation proceedings. Page4 of 5
¶7Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case is allowed, and the impugned order dated 02.12.2025 made in Crl.M.P.No.1294 of 2025, passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thirukoilur, is set aside. 26-02-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order dk Copy to:
¶1The Judicial Magistrate Thirukoilur.
¶2The Station House Officer Thirukoilur Police Station, Thirukoilur, Kallakurichi District.
¶3The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras, Chennai – 600 104. CRLoRCoNo.388oofo2026 SUNDERoMOHAN,oJ. dk CRLoRCoNo.o388oofo2026 26-02-2026 Page5oofo5
Case details
Parties and counsel
2026:MHC:851 Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 26-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN CRL RC No. 388 of 2026 Rajadurai S/o.Ananthan, Mariyamman Koil Street, G.Ariyur Village, Thirukoilur Taluk, Kallakurichi District. ...Petitioner/Petitioner Vs The Station House Officer, Thirukoilur Police Station, Thirukoilur, Kallakurichi District. ...Respondent/ Respondent Prayer : Criminal Revision Petition filed under Section 438 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, to call for the records pertaining to Crl.M.P.No.1294 of 2025 dated 02.12.2025 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thirukoilur and set aside the same further directing the respondent police to return the property YAMAHA FZ-S bearing registration No.TN15MD5350 pertaining to Crime No.601 of 2025 on the file of respondent. For Petitioner : M/S.S.Kumaresan For Respondent: Mr.R.Vinothraja Government Advocate (Crl.Side) Page2 of 5
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.