VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

The General Manager, v. R.Manichandran

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
20 February 2026
Bench
S. M. Subramaniamauthor
Case no.
REV.APLW 46/2026

Judgment

ORDER Review Petition has been instituted to review the order dated

02.11.2018 passed in W.P.No.28319 of 2013.

¶2Learned Special Government Pleader would mainly contend that relief was granted to the writ petitioner in paragraph No.8. In Paragraph No.8(iii), this Court has passed an order stating that ""On receipt of such payment and application, the authorities competent are directed to consider the application submitted by the writ petitioner favourably for extending the scheme of rehabilitation of sick units to the writ petitioner also, within a period of four weeks from the date of deposit of the said amount of Rs.25,00,000/-". Once a direction was issued to consider the application, the word "favourably" would be an impediment for the authorities to consider the eligibility of the writ petitioners to avail the scheme of rehabilitation. Thus, it is to be treated as an error apparent.

¶3This Court has passed an order directing the competent authority to consider the application on its own merits, and based on the eligibility criteria fixed to avail the benefits of the scheme of rehabilitation. Therefore, the word "favourably" in Paragraph No.8(iii) is deleted and read as "On receipt of such Page3 of 5 payment and application, the authorities competent are directed to consider the application submitted by the writ petitioner for extending the scheme of rehabilitation of sick units to the writ petitioner also, within a period of four weeks from the date of deposit of the said amount of Rs.25,00,000/-". Accordingly, the review petitioner shall consider the application submitted by the writ petitioners for extending the scheme of rehabilitation on its own merits and by following the procedure. Thus, the review petition is allowed. No costs. 20-02-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order GD To

¶1R.Manichandran S/o. G.Ramachandran, Cashewnut Processing Unit, No. 1199-1, Vedharanyam Road, Prathaparamapuram, Kilvelur Tk., Nagapttinam Dist.

¶2The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Industrial Investment Corporation, No. 692, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai-600035.

¶3The Senior Regional Manager, Indian Overseas Bank, Naduvar East Street, LRJ Complex, Nagapattinam - 611 001.

¶4The Branch Manager, Indian Overseas Bank, Mannargudi, Thiruvarur District. Page4 of 5

¶5The Branch Manager, Indian Overseas Bank, Velankanni, Nagapattinam District. Page5 of 5

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. GD 20-02-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

2026:MHC:854 Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 20-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM 1. The General Manager, District Industries Centre, Nagapattinam. 2. The Secretary, Mincro Small and Medium Enterprises Department, Govt. of Tamil Nadu, Fort St. George, Chennai-600009. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. R.Manichandran S/o. G.Ramachandran, Cashewnut Processing Unit, No. 1199-1, Vedharanyam Road, Prathaparamapuram, Kilvelur Tk., Nagapttinam Dist. 2. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Industrial Investment Corporation, No. 692, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai-600035. 3. The Senior Regional Manager, Indian Overseas Bank, Naduvar East Street, LRJ Complex, Nagapattinam - 611 001. 4. The Branch Manager, Indian Overseas Bank, Mannargudi, Thiruvarur District. 5. The Branch Manager, Indian Overseas Bank, Velankanni, Nagapattinam District. ..Respondent(s) To review the order dated 02.11.2018 made in WP.No. 28319 of 2013. Page2 of 5 For Petitioner(s): Mr.U.M.Ravichandran Special Government Pleader For Respondent(s): Mr.K.Magesh for R2 Mr.L.Dhamodharan for R4 & 5

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.